Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 91

Thread: Brake Booster recall extended to other VINs

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
    Is there oil in the brake vac line. There is a connector not far from the booster, stick you finger over the pipe and see if there is oil on it then undo the connection on the booster and stick something in to see if it had oil in it.
    If there is you may have to fight but they should fix for free.
    Yep there is a fair bit, I un-clipped the easiest to reach part of the line and it oozed out, from both ends, seems the booster has heaps of oil in it.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Trivett have refused to do the recall, calling LRA now.

    Any advice on what to say?

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Tell them this is a safety issue and they need to fix it.
    Tell them that you think the vehicle is dangerous as a result if this fault and you want a loan vehicle whilst they repair FOC.
    Tell them there is a 'reasonable expectation' that the brake booster would not fail within the period from manufacture. (this is your right under Australian consumer law)
    If they refuse you will be reporting them to the ACCC.
    Be a hard arse with them, the law is on your side but they may try to get out.
    Did Trivett ask LR on your behalf or just refuse saying: "the computer says no"?



    These are on the ACCC site check your VIN against these first:

    Land Rover

    Land Rover

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
    Tell them this is a safety issue and they need to fix it.
    Tell them that you think the vehicle is dangerous as a result if this fault and you want a loan vehicle whilst they repair FOC.
    Tell them there is a 'reasonable expectation' that the brake booster would not fail within the period from manufacture. (this is your right under Australian consumer law)
    If they refuse you will be reporting them to the ACCC.
    Be a hard arse with them, the law is on your side but they may try to get out.
    Did Trivett ask LR on your behalf or just refuse saying: "the computer says no"?



    These are on the ACCC site check your VIN against these first:

    Land Rover

    Land Rover
    Yep my VIN is within the first link set of numbers, thanks!

    The car is now sitting at Alto waiting to be 'assessed'.

    Problem is the recall was done a few years ago, and whatever work was done obviously didn't fix the problem and the booster now has heaps of oil in it.

    It really feels as though it wont't be paid for by LRA. Time will tell I guess.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
    Tell them this is a safety issue and they need to fix it.
    Tell them that you think the vehicle is dangerous as a result if this fault and you want a loan vehicle whilst they repair FOC.
    Tell them there is a 'reasonable expectation' that the brake booster would not fail within the period from manufacture. (this is your right under Australian consumer law)
    If they refuse you will be reporting them to the ACCC.
    Be a hard arse with them, the law is on your side but they may try to get out.
    Did Trivett ask LR on your behalf or just refuse saying: "the computer says no"?



    These are on the ACCC site check your VIN against these first:

    Land Rover

    Land Rover
    Oh and to confirm, Trivett was 'computer says no'. But in their defense I think they are super busy, that said LRA weren't happy that they didn't even confide in them. But I don't mind the mob at Alto seem pretty switched on and eager to help.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have found Alto will go into bat for you.
    It has been found that the recall has not fixed it or dealer failed to check for oil. Booster should have been replaced first time. LR have to pay by law.
    What did LRA say?

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
    I have found Alto will go into bat for you.
    It has been found that the recall has not fixed it or dealer failed to check for oil. Booster should have been replaced first time. LR have to pay by law.
    What did LRA say?
    No word just yet, ALTO have been great so far, I really hope they can help otherwise I will be telling them not to do the repair and just driving it as with a pending marriage and and an unexpected large expense I simply can not afford it.
    The booster did have a new tag on it, so I'd say the whole lot was replaced when they did the recall back in 2010, not sure why the oil would start to get into it again?

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bangor, NSW
    Posts
    1,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I wouldn't rule out a manufacturing fault in the valve on the updated hose.

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    791
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jonesy63 View Post
    I wouldn't rule out a manufacturing fault in the valve on the updated hose.
    Yeah that would be my assumption. Still no word from LR if it will be done under recall, the wait is killing me. And no car for the long weekend is a bit of a bummer, but I will get over it.

    When I un-clipped the easiest to reach pipe, oil came out of both ends, from the valve and from the booster. Not a good sign.

    Cheers,
    Ben

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So - as I understand it the car was recalled and the appropriate work done as part of the recall. Now sometime later you are suffering the same issue that caused the recall in the first place - noting that the recall was done irrespective whether the the car was under warranty or not (mine wasn't).

    Seems pretty straight forward to me - the recall work failed so LR have an obligation to fix, the same obligation when the recall work was first done.

    As I have not heard of the recall work failing, I would consider betting that they used earlier new parts, not the new modifed ones that were supposed to go in.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!