JMB,
I tested all three prior to purchasing my D3 in early 2009.
My assessment of each was;
1. X5 - Great car, awesome drive for a big car, beautiful diesel engine, my wife loved it. But if I wanted a real "driving car" I would go a sedan not a SUV. To option it up to get close to the kit I got in the D3 SE the price difference was significant. Finally I wanted a real 4wd. Scrub the X5;
2. RRS - I loved the look of these from the first time I saw one and this is what I thought I would get. But I could not justify the cost premium for a vehicle with 2 less seats and smaller cargo area and not that much better a drive (IMHO) than the D3. Scrub the RRS
3. D3 - Perfectly fitted the bill, enough luxury to keep the wife happy, more than enough 4wd ability to keep me happy, plenty of space for the family for travelling and an amazingly good on road for a large 4wd.
As the D4 by all accounts is even better than the D3 in both the 2.7 and 3.0 diesel I think the decision should be easy.
Sorry for my late entry to this discussion but i hope it helps.
Enjoy either way.
Regards,
George
The above is interesting. Can anyone give some feedback on a well chipped/flashed 2.7 versus a stock 3l? Just as a matter of interest cause I suppose you could chip a 3.0 as well, but if the 2.7 chipped is getting close to the 3.0 in real world driving and towing that might be a very good option for a D4 purchase.
Cheers
Chipped 2.7 would probably go as well as a 3.0 D4.
For at least fifteen minutes.
I'm getting my D4 3L chipped next week! can't wait they reckon upto 720nm!!!
Dorko
Thanks Fellas.
Sounds like a chipped 2.7 is a very nice bit of kit and easily enough of a grunter to pull 2 tonns around all day without sweat.
Chipped 3.0 TTD 700+ NM - Christ!
Cheers
A chipped/remapped D3 2.7 still won't match a 3.0 ltr. A chipped 3.0 ltr will outrun a TDV8. Regardless, even a std 2.7 ltr will out-tow most rigs on the road.
Cheers,
Gordon
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks