I think that it simply means that the recovery eyelet and tongue insert are not suppled wth the Mitch Hitch - not that they can't be used wth the Mitch Hitch. Best to verify with Mitchell Bros though.
Gday...
Am contemplating getting rid of "the plough" and getting a Mitch Hitch. Their website states the following rider:
NOTE: NEW SERIES TOW HITCH DOES NOT HAVE THE BUILT IN RECOVERY EYELET. PICS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY AND DOES NOT COME WITH THE TONGUE INSERT EITHER.
Has anyone seen the "new series tow hitch" as yet and if so any comments? How do you 'cope' without the recovery eyelet? What other differences are there?
The standard D3 tow/hitch works really well with our current van, but we are thinking of getting a smaller van with 'off-road' capability therefore we will quite probably need the additional rear ground clearance.
Cheers
John
Last edited by Rockylizard; 13th October 2010 at 01:37 PM. Reason: Fixed the grammar !
I think that it simply means that the recovery eyelet and tongue insert are not suppled wth the Mitch Hitch - not that they can't be used wth the Mitch Hitch. Best to verify with Mitchell Bros though.
Roger
Hi
Rockylizard
I have the new type it do,s not have the recovery eye on top. I usually just use my pin with R clip you can buy a gizmo that fits up into where the tounge goes with a eye on it ( TJM / oppisite lock /aRB ) they all have them. the tounge does not come with it because they dont know the hight of your trailer.
Connok
Paging CaverD3...
In the meantime, I think the eyelet was only on the initial batches. It is certainly not required -- simply insert the eye of the strap into the hitch, pass the pin through and recover away. A recommended accessory.
That being the case where do you hook your trailer safety chains up to? Currently I use the recovery hoop between the two plugs because it is the easiest to access.
Wot Robert said.
Early ones had an eylet above the tongue receiver for recovery, later ones didn't.
Do what RMP suggests or get a recovery tongue with a D shackle.
Chains attach to the holes in the flange below the receiver.
Robert do you know anything about Land Rover giving 'advice in Overlander about the Mitch hitch and 4x4 intellegence wheel carrier?
No idea. That is the second time in two weeks I've been asked that question and I honestly have no clue what it is about.
My own views on the subjects are quite clear, well known and have not changed, although I've not written about them for a while. A manufacturer recommending against a product will not change my mind unless it can be demonstrated there is an engineering as opposed to commercial reason.
I had one fitted only last month and used the holes either side of the receiver as stated above. Did the job fine towing my camper trailer (900+kg) around. It felt so much safer that towing with the original LR plow. Weight was evenly distributed, trailer hung slightly higher but better than the low option. Very impressed and really, after I got over the cost, it was well worth it. Better than having the bloody thing feel like it's going to fall off, weighs heavy on the mind!
Gday...
Thanks to all ...
Hedleylamar ... I am an old fashioned kinder guy (read control freak) and usually like to see and touch before I buy.
We will be 'home' in Sale for about a month from this weekend and we are thinking of changing our van.
Would it be OK if I PM you in a week or so to see if we can meet somewhere so I can have a look at a Mitch Hitch on a vehicle? (or is there someone on the eastern side of Melb who would be willing?)
Conversely, is there a 'dealer' where I can go and see a Mitch Hitch? Not keen on buying one online before seeing.
Thanks again all
Cheers
John
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks