Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Expedition rack load rating

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Expedition rack load rating

    LR's site gives the load rating for the Expedition rack as 54kg which, if correct, is nothing at all I think. One spare wheel and a Jerry can and you're overloaded?

    I tried to compare this with an 1800 x 1200 Rhino alloy rack but they don't seem to show the load rating anywhere

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That's correct. The total load rating is really the roof limit which is 75kg. Subtract the weight of the rack and you have your roof payload. All the racks will support more weight than the load limit, which is the limiting factor.

    Now there is the manufacturer's limit, and the real limit. In the case of the Defender people place on the roof everything from sleeping bags to Japanese utes, despite it also being a paltry 75kg. So I think the real limit is more than 75kg for the D3, but don't go crying to Land Rover if your B and C pillars are cracked under the load.

    54kg is quite a lot of weight for what should be carried up top. Our tent, sleeping stuff and camp chairs don't total that much and that's all we really need to carry up there, the light, bulky stuff. I don't carry a sixth rim, just a tyre and changing tools, and that saves a lot of weight too. I would not carry jerries on a rack, get a LR tank or carry water inside somewhere, lots of ways to do that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    128
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Keep in mind when loading a vehicle the lower in the vehicle the heavier items are the more stable the vehicle will be under all conditions i.e. that nasty sideslope or around that gravel bend that tightens on the exit with a big ditch on the outside. As we approach our vehicles weight carrying limits we also have to be careful of the side to side and front to rear weight distribution given the siffering limits on each axle/hub.

    I have the Rhino Alloy tray and one of the reasons i purchased this is because it was alloy and hence lighter therefore keeping the weight down that is up on the roof, hence allowing me to get more up there if i need to. Having said that the smaller steel wire basket i had previously was lighter!

    The 75kg load limit is also the safe working limit i.e. the vehcile manufacturer has allowed for that weight whilst in motion i.e. heavy braking, acceleration, speed humps hit at speed, corrugated roads etc. In static conditions the roof will take more than the 75kg this ii how people get away with a two person tent with two people in it!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    225
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You don't want to go heavy on the roof anyway as this then changes the centre of gravity and affects the handling, not to mention roll over probability increasing at speed. Also you've got to be able to lug stuff up top easily too.
    I'm amazed at how many overloaded/top heavy vehicles I saw recently in the Flinders Ranges (Prado's mostly!). Multiple tyres, jerry cans etc. Looked to me like they were compensating for lack of size elsewhere if you get what I mean!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Surprised Prados needed jerries on the roof. Must have been water I expect.

    Yes keeping roof weight down is a good idea but if the suspension is set up nicely and the vehicle is driven gently it can work so I wouldn't be too quick to judge.

    Alloy racks are definitely the way to go.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!