Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Freelander 2 or Discovery 3 ?

  1. #1
    kushanf Guest

    Freelander 2 or Discovery 3 ?


    I am hoping some of the more experienced Land Rover owners here would be able to provide me on advice on the best vehicle option.

    I am hoping to travel around Australia early next year and cover the Simpsons Dessert crossing and few other 4wd tracks in NSW outback, Northern Territory and Western Australia.

    I would like to know if I should look for a low kilometer Discovery 3 (2009) or a brand new Freelander 2. It looks like both of these will be around the same price.

    I have seen several reviews and You Tube videos on the Freelanders off road performance and it looks pretty impressive. Most reviews does say that the Freelander will go anywhere a Discovery or Defender will go, but a bit slower. Is this really correct ? I am concerned about the lack of low range on the Freelander but would this be a real issue ?

    The discovery 3 is a bit above the size I would like for the normal day to day city driving and my budget would allow only a basic Discovery 3 vs. a perhaps HSE Freelander.

    I would be really interested to hear from any Freelander 2 owners who have taken it out for serious outback off road trips.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    25
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go for the D3SE.

    I have a D4 and FL2 TD SE for wife. FL2 is a good car....... but not as capable as the D3/4. as you need go for a long trip the D3's extra space should be nice.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Kogarah,

    The Freelander will go probably 95% of where a D3 will take you (or where most owners would be prepared to go), however if and when you are out in the middle of nowhere that 5% will be very very important as it means the difference between keeping going and turning around.

    The Freelander has no low range and much less ground clearance than the D3 so it will need to work harder and potentially be exposed to damage if the going gets a bit tough.

    The D3 is an awesome machine, effortless long distance tourer and highly capable off road. The diesel is a very popular choice, however the petrol V6 can be picked up 2nd hand quite cheaply as an alternative to the diesel but for outback travel range becomes an issue for the petrol as the consumption is somewhat higher.

    Hope this helps.

    George

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Yass NSW
    Posts
    5,599
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Having had few FL2s as loan vehicles I prefer the diesel and they are a very nice vehicle. I would be concerned about how much space I would need for a long trip. The additional ground clearance and capability of the D3 would be an added bonus.
    If buying from a dealer I would be pushing for an extended warranty for the D3 as part of the deal. Theses can also be purchased seperately if buying privately.

    Regards,
    Tote
    Go home, your igloo is on fire....
    2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
    MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
    1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
    1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project

    Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Kogarah,

    Might also be worthwhile post a question on the freelander channel on the site as well, I am sure they can give you an informed view of what is possible in an FL2.

    George

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bangor, NSW
    Posts
    1,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agree with prior comments, but would like to add one more factor: AFAIK, the FL2 doesn't come with low range. That would be a limiting factor if you were climbing the Vic high country or similar - but touring around Australia - maybe not.

    Just another factor to consider.

    Cheers,
    Rob

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,681
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Check Mike's posts in the Freelander area, he's been on a lot of outback tracks.

    My thoughts would be:

    1. Forget the HSE Freelander, the cheaper one is the one for what you're doing. It's got better tyres. Same problem as D3s/4s.

    2. The Freelander has conventional strut suspension. No airbags etc to worry about.

    3. The Freelander is quite a comfortable touring car. However, it's the lack of cargo space that swings the decision towards the D3.

    4. Low range might be needed from time to time in the Simpson Desert, but otherwise not really for general touring. Hire one & get up to Stockton Beach & see for yourself. (With someone else though!) Had mine up there once, & it went everywhere the bigger trucks did. No gear & just me admittedly.

    I'd have no qualms about a Simpson crossing in convoy. There's always someone at Birdville Caravan Park asking around viz, crossing together.

    I'm sure the D3 would be better, but the FL2 is pretty capable. And whether D3 or FL2, avoid the low profile tyres!

    Regards
    Max P

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All good advice.

    The FL2 is not as capable offroad as the D3. Furthermore, the gap widens quickly as you load the car further. Anything the FL2 does, the D3 will do easier when offroad. The particular limitation of the FL2 will be steep hills as per the High Country...especially when you need to drive them slowly, the car is loaded and it is a hot day. First gear simply isn't low enough. You will also find the slight loss of ground clearance an irritation in many situations, even rough dirt roads. Rocks will be another issue.

    Around town the dimensions are not too dissimilar, have a look at them. Main difference is the D3 is taller and seems more bulky -- it is, but not by enough to make a difference. The D3 is extremely easy around town.

    The FL2 lacks cargo space and there are very few accessories for it -- you may wish to acquire a snorkel, dual battery, bar and other touring gear. Easy for a D3, not the FL2.

    My recommendation, based on your requirements, is definitely the D3.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    east gippsland
    Posts
    282
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Kushanf, With the trips you are talking about i assume your towing something? If not then you really will struggle for space with the FL however if you are towing something then you will probably struggle a little in other areas. I've done alot of travelling in those regions and even with just 2 of us and nothing in tow space is a premium.
    The other thing is the D3 has a better turning circle than some of the cars i have driven around town, as has been said, don't be decieved by it's bulky aperance, it makes an excellent town car { of course it does depend on which town you are in LOL}
    happy travels mate in your D3 when you get it LOL

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    adelaide
    Posts
    291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi kushanf
    D3 for all the above reasons, if you intend doing serious out back trips go for diesal as you cant buy petrol in some areas, and fuel drops can get expensive and its not petrol they will bring its opal fuel so you will have to remove your cat converter or replace it when you get home. TDV6 SE great car you will love it!!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!