Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: So what is a D3 rated recovery point?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rmp View Post
    Given a snatch point could conceivably be needed to withstand a load of 3x the vehicle GVM or even more nobody will rate one.

    The fact is the point is the same on the D3/D4 and as per FAQ it is rated to GCM. If you snatch more than that then you're into dangerous territory and will probably have broken your strap.

    The point is not just a tiedown.

    Many people use it as a recovery point, myself included.

    Unless you wish to pay for independent testing at great cost this is as good as it gets.
    Nope, if they've been given a good workout thus far with no issue, I'm happy with that. D3s been around since 2004, right?, something would have surfaced by now if it wasn't the case. D4 is the same?, so it's fine.

    Cheers.

    Kev.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Garry - no, it wasn't a stupid question at all, it was a very smart one to do with safety. Sorry if my reply and others were a bit short, wasn't the intention.

    I should add that the standard caveats about recovery applies. You're most at risk during a snatch, and if the casualty vehicle isn't moving then do something to free it rather than just keep on pulling and pulling.

    Just because the points are strong does not mean the recovery will be safe. This may be obvious to some readers but I assure you it is not obvious to others who consider using the correct equipment some sort of magic license to do whatever silliness they choose with impunity.

    Celtoid yes your logic is sound, there have been no reports of problems with the points. One could always argue there's a first time, but you can also argue nothing is ever perfectly safe, such as the train I am sitting on right now may fail and crash. I'm taking that risk though, just as offroading and recovery is a considered risk. But I'd best post this quick just in case ;-)

    If you recover safely the recovery point can fail and nobody gets killed unless you're very unlucky.

    Even if you did pay for independent testing you'd get a carefully qualified report to avoid anyone saying "yes, you can snatch off these".

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    1,048
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just FYI, back in 2007 (when I bought my D3) I ended up calling LR UK on this issue and after much effort got through to one of the guys arranging the G4 Challenge. He confirmed that LR Legal eagles (and most other manufacturers) wont use the term "rated" as there are different interpretations globally (in legal terms) what that might mean. Its that simple. The handbook refers to each point as "tow points", again to reduce liability.

    He then said whilst he couldnt put it in writing LR had advised G4 entrants that independent testing indicated that Front and Back were "rated" to a minimum of 6 tonnes each. In all G4 Challenges there had never been a failure of either recovery point - and no customer complaint had ever been recorded at that time globally by LR UK. The front point on the Disco, RRS and RRV are recovery points not just shipping tie down points. In his words "this is as good an answer as you are ever going to get".

    Finally, gghaggis did fit (for competition work, as the above ofcourse doesnt satisfy scrutineers!) after market points to his old D3. Photos were on this site I think ages ago. Suspect he will see this and respond...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I fitted additional recovery points to the front of my D3 for scrutineering purposes back in 2006. This was after many an argument with the chief scrutineer, LRE in England and myself. The short version was:

    * LRE believe the factory points safe to 6 tonne for recovery - they don't rate the rear one higher because the limiting factor is the bar it is attached to, not the hook per se.

    * The chief scrutineer here in WA wanted a hook that was "rated" at a min of 4 tonne. As I pointed out, there was no "rating requirement" for the way it was attached to the vehicle (or more precisely, what the shock load on the supporting structure is). It's just "assumed" to be greater than the hook.

    So I attached a 4 tonne recovery hook with 4 high tensile M8 bolts to the same bar the front recovery hook was on. We never used it, as the rating for the LR one was (in my eyes) higher.

    Have never heard of one failing, and we use ours a lot!

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That's funny/sad...I can just imagine the conversation. Must have been immensely frustrating.

    These recovery points are in fact a major differentiator for the Disco vs say the Touareg, which has a pathetic screw-in that I certainly wouldn't want to put any stress on. If a modern vehicle doesn't have a recovery point adding one is not usually simple, unlike the days gone by when there were two huge great chassis rails sticking out waiting for a drill.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!