Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 255/18 ContiCrossContact AT Report

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0

    255/18 ContiCrossContact AT Report

    I have the ContiCrossContact AT's fitted to the 18" rims yesterday (Thanks Gordon). I am pleasantly surprised at how good the car feels and drives on these tyres. The ride feels more compliant than on the 20" wheels and rims. I haven't detected any significant road noise increase either.

    There is a slight difference in the feel of the steering but nothing adverse.

    The next mission is to find a replacement for the 20" tyres given that I now have the 18's for the D4 the tyres for the 20's will be a 100% road tyre. My thoughts are headed towards the ContiCrossContact UHP.

    Photos.

    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/d3-d4-rrs/...ml#post1460294

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Looks good! Just that little bit extra sidewall height makes the tyres look more practical and the open tread even more so. The RWC is practical too. I cringe at my 19s but will fix them within a day or so but a bit longer for a RWC.

    I like the strong, rich colour - what is it? It fits well with the robust-looking rims.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I appreciate that these tyres max width is 255 but is there any reason why you did not go to a 265 width tyres or is it that you just like the Contis.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I appreciate that these tyres max width is 255 but is there any reason why you did not go to a 265 width tyres or is it that you just like the Contis.

    Garry
    I read what Gordon had to say on the subject... I looked around and ended up with the Contis...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    Looks good! Just that little bit extra sidewall height makes the tyres look more practical and the open tread even more so. The RWC is practical too. I cringe at my 19s but will fix them within a day or so but a bit longer for a RWC.

    I like the strong, rich colour - what is it? It fits well with the robust-looking rims.
    The colour is Rimini Red its seems more common on Range Rovers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm getting a set on my L322 in the next couple of weeks to replace the cross contact UHP's. Pat

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mowog View Post
    There is a slight difference in the feel of the steering but nothing adverse.
    mowog,

    I have these on my D3 and agree they are a very good all round AT but you do need to be careful in rocky terrain as the sidewalls are soft and prone to cutting. I have had to change one tyre due to a cut after a day off road.

    The first time I had the AT's fitted I did a weekend trip which involved some dirt road driving and after the first couple of km's I stopped to check if i had a flat as I could feel the tyre squirming as the tread blocks moved around on the ruts and undulations. Since then I have not noticed this, but do run then up around 40 psi now.

    I put this down to coming from the conti UHP's which are a terrific 100% road tyre, excellent grip, no road noise and very fuel efficient. I find my fuel use up about 1lt /100km with the cross contact's on.

    The Rimini Red D3 with black rims looks great, nice rear bar as well !

    George

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had a chance over the weekend to test out the Conti's some more. First with the van attached. It seems to ride better with the van on the 18's maybe because the tyres have more flex.

    Without the van attached we tried some roads with course surfaces with no real noticeable noise increase over what the 20's would have done.

    On the way into the city today on wet roads and roundabouts there was a noticeable difference in grip this is certainly a weak point with the Conti's. It just means you have to change driving style to stay within the limitations of the tyres.

    Over all I am very happy with the Conti's.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mowog View Post

    On the way into the city today on wet roads and roundabouts there was a noticeable difference in grip this is certainly a weak point with the Conti's. It just means you have to change driving style to stay within the limitations of the tyres.

    Over all I am very happy with the Conti's.
    Interesting,

    I had someone at an LR dealer tell wife she was brave to have them on the D3 as they had no grip in the wet ?

    I personally have never had any problems with them in the wet or dry. I consider myself a reasonably aggressive driver but have always cornered the D3 with a bit of moderation noting it is a nearly 3t 4wd but never yet had the AT's let go on me.

    George.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!