Danger - potential hijacking of thread.

Originally Posted by
Stuart02
I think including product support for something that's redundant before you even leave the showroom, at least for 5 or so years, isn't unreasonable.
Do you pay for every security update on your computer?
It's not an unreasonable comparison.
If, and only if, the mapping were up to date, maybe up to two years out of date from current real world, then I might be prepared to pay a premium for the updates.
I'm not expecting miracles here, I know it takes a little while to collate and publish the latest mapping data but expecting people to pay a premium for something that is properly obsolete (4-5 years old) is just not right.
Before someone points out that you have to pay for paper maps, yes, I know that. Yes, they are often even more out of date than the GPS digital ones.
Street directories actually tend to be very up to date. You can get one of them for an entire metro area for less than $50. Most of this cost is the material (paper). So why am I paying $300+ for digital equivalents, that don't need to get printed and bound, and are less up to date. This last surprises me still, since they come from the same source data typically.
Let's also not forget that unlike most normal computer applications you're not paying for support as part of whatever price. If your car GPS doesn't function properly you're still gonna get charged for someone to diagnose (and hopefully resolve) your problem.
As an example, look at computer antivirus software, I don't pay directly for the virus definitions and updates that happen on a very regular basis. I pay annually to ensure I have the latest software (and the definitions are part of that). I'd be happy to do that, having made the initial investment but I don't perceive value for money in what I get when it comes to GPS mapping.
Just my 2c worth.
Cheers,
Iain
Iain
VK3BIT
03MY Range Rover HSE Td6
Nudge Bar, Sat-Nav, Cargo Barrier, IC-450, IC-706 and Codan 9350, DT-90 DBS, Chipped!
LROCV DTU member
Bookmarks