Looking at the brochures and the tyre people, it seems that you can get AT tyres for 18" rims (not available on the 3.0) and for 20" rims but not with 19" rims.
Is this what others are finding?
There seems to be a problem with the BFG site
Here is the Jax sizings
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO Tyres
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Looking at the brochures and the tyre people, it seems that you can get AT tyres for 18" rims (not available on the 3.0) and for 20" rims but not with 19" rims.
Is this what others are finding?
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
Regarding the relative acceleration merits of the 2.7 vs the 3.0 another factor may be the torque converter in the trans.
The Jags with the same engines (I know they're slightly different, esp the 2.7) run a torque converter with higher torque multiplication in the 2.7 and also unlock the torque converter at the slightest whiff of extra throttle so the engine instantly revs up into the peak torque band.
In the name of extra fuel economy, lower emissions, blah blah, the 3.0 has a tc with a bit less torque multiplication and will keep the tc locked till very low speeds and just use the torque of the engine to accelerate like a manual box kept in 5th. Unless you nail it to kick down of course
Might be the same issues in the Discos....
Dan
'14 Def 110
'75 Lightweight
'98 300Tdi Disco (gone)
'80 2Dr Rangie Classic (gone)
Traded my 2.7 LR3 in on a 3 litre RRS recently.
Absolutely no comparison between the engines, the 3 litre gives virtually instantaneous response every time whereas the 2.7 always hesitated. I found that my driving style changed to make allowance for the lag in the 2.7 but getting into the 3 litre really showed it up.
Regards,
Barryp
What i should have said is there are no LT tyres in 18" size similar diameter to OEM.If you want to go to say 265/65/18 etc,the vehicle will need modifications.....& may not e legal in some states.
I went to 17's and have ordered a set of LT rugged terrains,which is there new tyre.
The Aus BFG site is not much good,better off looking at the US site,but it still doesn't tell you what sizes are available here,which is a PITA.
No, you shouldn't need mods to fit the 265/65R18 - it's the same rolling diameter as a 265/70R17, which many people here have fitted to their D3's. Legalities, as you've pointed out, vary from state to state.
Variation in tyre design can often blur the line between LT and P designations. There are some P tyres with 121 loading or higher, some LT's with 117. Sidewall construction materials can now make some P tyres arguably a better choice for a modern 4WD - the Cooper LTZ range comes to mind.
Cheers,
Gordon
Are the discounts at present because of the immenent 8 speed auto and is it worth the wait?
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
No mention to dealers as of yet that we are getting the 8 spd auto this year or next, future ?????
While the deals are there, it's good to take advantage of them, LR in general only do deals once or twice a year if that.
Have fun :-)
You would recon it's not to far away as it is in all models in the UK,including the base commercial model.
Maybe MY13 or 14,but probably gonna cost more again,& maybe not in all models,who knows?
I thought about this as well before my recent purchase,but as sniegy says the deals at the moment are very good,so i decided not to wait.Dollar for dollar with anything else around there is no comparison.
You couldn't get a D4 for the money you would pay today a few months ago.
Waiting for the 8 sp auto maybe like 'how long is a piece of string'![]()
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks