Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 108

Thread: Confused - D3/D4/RRS Towball Weight

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    28
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post

    Are you aware that heavy trucks tow heavier trailers with the only nose weight being the weight of the drawbar?
    Stability is about the entire vehicle and trailer interaction, it cannot be expressed in simple percentages as it is far more complex than that.
    Zero ball weight can be perfectly safe and stable, where trailers with the often touted 10% static ball weight can be a danger to everyone.

    Don't forget axle/suspension configuration. It's one of the biggest in trailer stability.

    Unfortunately that slide alone means nothing. If you were to include the SAE paper the presentation was about and the full power-point presentation then perhaps we could draw some conclusions. Such a graph can only beproduced relating to a specific case and we have no information about that specific case.
    Are the heavy trucks you are referring to much heavier than the trailer they are towing? Is the hitch point hanging off the back of the truck or between the axles? Does the trailer have two well spaced axles? If none of these answers are yes, then I doubt the rig would be at all stable at near 0 % ball load.

    Axle/suspension config - yes you are right, both their cornering stiffness and their damping have a big effect

    SAE paper/presentation- I dont have permission to post them publicly but can forward a copy to anyone interested if they PM me.

    In general I agree with the sentiment though that the actual cutoff points and instability lines would be specific to a particular rig.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tryanything View Post
    Are the heavy trucks you are referring to much heavier than the trailer they are towing? Is the hitch point hanging off the back of the truck or between the axles? Does the trailer have two well spaced axles? If none of these answers are yes, then I doubt the rig would be at all stable at near 0 % ball load.
    Yes, trailers several tons heavier than the towing truck and load.
    Yes hitch point well over a meter behind the centre of the rear axle group. Legislation here limits rear axis to tow-coupling at a maximum of 45% of the wheelbase.
    Trailers from two axle rigid to 5 axle (3 rear axles, two on the dolly).

    Close to zero ball (ring-feder) load. Only the drawbar weight is possible and these are sprung to sit level with no truck attached for ease of attachment.

    Here is just one example:


    Setups vary, but at the 44t max combination weight (without getting into overweight permits) the loaded trailers are about 4t heavier than the loaded trucks. Primarily because dimensions work out to greater load space in the trailer.
    The official New Zealand road code for heavy vehicles - Information for heavy vehicle drivers

    I am very interested in information on that SAE paper.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I figure this is a good time for this landrover promotional video.

    I'd estimate the towed load at
    2.3t of defender 110
    700+kg of trailer.
    So there is an easy 3 ton.

    I can't recall whether the downforce on the hitch shown is 150 or 250kg. Either way, the nose load is a lot less than the 350kg spoken about here.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gyc4Dmgbew]Land Rover's "Trailer Stability Assist" for Range Rover, Range Rover Sport and Discovery 4/ LR4 - YouTube[/ame]

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    28
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The analysis work I have seen done is for trailer setups where there is only one axle, or two close together near the centre of gravity. Trailer setups where there is an axle near each corner as per the photos are inherrently more stable.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    28
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I dont doubt the effectiveness of trailer stability programs on vehicles such as the D4 to improve stability. In fact I found a research paper for that too ( though not specifically for the D4 program). http://delphi.com/pdf/techpapers/2008-01-1228.pdf


    Would be interesting to see how the D4 handled that rig with the trailer stability switched off?

    Dougal - Ill try to send you a copy of the other papers by pm

    As for those who are towing a very heavy van, the only warning I would give is that lack of oscillation is not necessarily an indication of stability. In general higher towball loads % will reduce sway oscillations, but as shown on the slide I posted it can lead to what is referred to a different kind of instability (divergent instabiliy), which is not associated with oscillation and can occur without warning if the rear tyre slip angles get too high ( due to for example a sudden side force)

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm missing the point you're trying to make? The PDF paper is a second order approximation for articulated vehicles. What are you trying to state w.r.t. towing with less than 10% towball weight for a D4?

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Orange Grove WA
    Posts
    1,274
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My touareg with the wdh is a superior ride towing our 3.5 tonne triple axle horse float then my airbag equipped D4....period.

    It is much harder to set up, and much harder to disconnect, with the toaureg, but the D4 is not as stable as the touareg with this kind of weight.

    Even my wife picked up on the difference....and it's very noticeable on uneven road surfaces. Less pitching and wallowing compared to the D4. The touareg would be a good couple of hundred kilos lighter.

    I was not expecting the D4 to be as stable, but closer, though it is a darn sight easier to setup and disconnect.....and for this reason alone we use the D4 more for heavy towing now.

    Brett....

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    28
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    I'm missing the point you're trying to make? The PDF paper is a second order approximation for articulated vehicles. What are you trying to state w.r.t. towing with less than 10% towball weight for a D4?

    Cheers,

    Gordon
    Gordon

    I paper I attached was in response to the post about the D4 active sway control using tow vehicle brakes. Thats what the paper deals with and concludes that it can help.

    It does also show the effect of towball load on the stability of the rig. In particular, it considers a vehicle weighing approx 2.7 tonne towing a trailer of approx 1.2 tonnes. It considers three towball loading cases, one at 10.8%, one at 2.8% and one at -8.8% (ie tail heavy van).

    It then calculates and verifies through testing using a vehicle and test trailer, the speed at which the Damping Ratio becomes negative. (Damping Ratio is simply a measure of how big subsequent sway movements are compared to an initial sway introduced by a steering movement for example). A bigger damping ratio means the sway movement diminishes quicker, a damping ratio of zero means the sway neither gets bigger nor smaller, and a negative damping ratio means the sway oscillations increase in size - ie kiss your tush goodbye.

    It concludes that the vehcile with 10.8% towball load has a critical speed ( speed at which damping ratio becomes negative) >160km/hr. For 2.8% towball load, critical speed is 105km/hr. For -8.8%, you're toast at 72km/hr!

    Ok so 2.8% towball load is a bit less than the 5.7% which was originally suggested, but the paper also highlights that the critical speed drops as the mass of the trailer increases relative to the vehicle mass.

    So given the test was done with a vehicle of about he weight of a disco, (2.7 tonne), but with a 1.2 tonne trailer, I dont think towing a 3.5 tonne trailer with a 5.7 % towball load would be very safe ( especially if you dont have the D4 trailer stability program! I wish my D3 did!)

    I have other papers on the subject of trailer stability and they deal with towball load amongst other factors, but as I mentioned they are materials which have been provided to me directly by the author and are otherwise only available for purchase via SAE.

    Hence I cannot upload them but am happy to send to those interested, provided they commit to not further distributing them.

    Regards
    Scott
    Last edited by Tryanything; 10th June 2012 at 08:44 PM. Reason: More detail added about conclusions of SAE paper

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Brett:
    Never towed with a Touareg, so can't directly comment - but I have with a LC200 + wdh, and the RRS was far more stable at high speed.

    Scott:
    The info is interesting, but I don't see the relevance to a D4 - which is not an articulated vehicle?

    I don't believe that a D4/RRS would have significant problems towing 3 tonne as long as there was some reasonable towball weight. What "reasonable" is seems to be the issue here - rule of thumb is around 10%, and it would appear that LR automotive engineers design around this figure. There doesn't seem to be any evidence that 6% or so is _not_ safe when considering a twin-axle caravan of this weight on the back of a D4, all other things being equal.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kuranda, Queensland
    Posts
    213
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I do not know the technical side of this debate, I have held a road train license (110 tone 4 trailer) and have done over 150K towing a 3 tone van behind an 80 series and now a D3.
    I have missed the point entirely on the comparison of a van to the other trailers mentioned ?

    My 80 with a WDH on a bad road - plenty up here in FNQ - pitched far less than the D3, however was nowhere near the tow vehicle that the Disco is, however we have not done enough mileage to give a definite opinion on the D3. I feel I would be happier with a WDH but am not using one but I see quite a few that do on air suspended L/R, D3/4's, they are also quite happy using them.
    As far as ball weight goes we have done quite a bit of travell in both the states and the U.K. and find it is only Aust. that has this 10% figure, last year in the U.K.we did over 5000 miles in a hired M.Home and most vaners that we camped with all worked on under 5%, and they pull 20/24 ft van with cars that we would not dream of using as a tug, the vans a lot lighter than ours though.
    In the states we saw a lot more large heavy vans than we expected, thought they might be predominantly 5th wheelers, saw no more than half a dozen WDH's in use in 2 months.

    A long ay to say I basically agree with Gordon.

    DD

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!