Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Can you "zero" the fuel consumption.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    No I havent but I know that the speedo over reads by 6KPH (apparently it's mandatory that speedo's over read to slow the population down) but haven't checked the odo so until that is checked it's pointless calibrating the consumption.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #12
    JamesH Guest
    My speedo is incorrect, reads high as said above. I have not checked the accuracy of the odometer against a GPS though. I'm guessing it's not a given that becasue the speedo is wrong the odo is wrong.

    As to the fuel average, mine is definitely bulldust compared to what I'm calculating based on the fuel I'm actually using measured at the bowser. It does indicate how you're going in the context of its own (faulty) algorithm though, and that's useful.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesH View Post
    My speedo is incorrect, reads high as said above. I have not checked the accuracy of the odometer against a GPS though. I'm guessing it's not a given that becasue the speedo is wrong the odo is wrong.
    Correct - different parameters are set in the CCF to set the accuracy of these independently.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesH View Post
    <snip> .... As to the fuel average, mine is definitely bulldust compared to what I'm calculating based on the fuel I'm actually using measured at the bowser. It does indicate how you're going in the context of its own (faulty) algorithm though, and that's useful.
    I do watch the fuel economy and try to drive to achieve the best economy, even if it is innaccurate, but without the ability to clear the previous data it was a pointless exercise for the first few hundred Km.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When you check the odo you will find it will be almost spot on,as per ADR's.

    The speedo has to read more than you are actually going,most modern vehicles are doing around 96 to 97k/hr when the speedo says 100k/hr.

    As others have said it is nice to be able to see approx. fuel consumption.

    But there are many other vehicles on the market that are VERY accurate,fuel consumption being the same as calculated.

    You would think LR could sort it........

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    I don't know if the different tyres (General Grabber AT) will be a different rolling radius to the OEM fittings, but I suspect this is the reason for the difference of 6KPH for the speedo and makes for an error possibility in the ODO.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #17
    JamesH Guest
    What I'm doing is leaving Trip A as a long term average fuel consumption figure and resetting Trip B at every fill up. You could also reset B when conditions change like hooking up a trailer, leaving the bitumen and changing the terrain control setting etc.

    I enjoy tracking this stuff for its own sake as I'm an anorak/nerd by nature.

    Just for fun when we were both going in convoy down to his farm about an hour south of Perth a mate and I both reset our trip meters, me in the D4 and him in a 2009 V8 diesel full sized Rangie. Traffic was smooth but busy and we spent a lot of time driving like nannas at about 80-90 kph. He got 9.3 l/100km, I got 7.9.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I just reset my "Trip B" after filling up and it definately reset the fuel consumption reading back to zero. First update was after about 1 kilometer and it obviously was not accumulating on the previous balance.
    Regards
    Barryp

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    When you check the odo you will find it will be almost spot on,as per ADR's.

    The speedo has to read more than you are actually going,most modern vehicles are doing around 96 to 97k/hr when the speedo says 100k/hr.

    As others have said it is nice to be able to see approx. fuel consumption.

    But there are many other vehicles on the market that are VERY accurate,fuel consumption being the same as calculated.

    You would think LR could sort it........
    The speedo has to not read slow and if fast it must be within a particular tolerance which IIRC is 10%.

    Whilst LR wont adjust the parameters, aftermarket tools can. My odometer was correct for standard size tyres but has now been adjusted for the slightly larger tyres, the speedo is now 1 kph fast at 100 kph and the fuel consumption is now quite accurate for my average driving although it can vary if I have a stint of spirited or grandpa driving.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!