Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: the reliability curve.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    344
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Or "beer holders" as my mates call them

    These vehicles are too complex to have a basic curve for reliability. They're a heavy 4x4 vehicle so the costs to maintain them is always going to be higher than for a smaller car. Ongoing costs for my 08 RRS with me doing ALL of the work have been around $1000 per 10,000K including tires, or double what my Audi A4 quattro costs to maintain.

    The curve idea might be useful to compare one which has been serviced according to LR's completely inadequate service schedule, versus one which has been serviced by someone who understands mechanical devices. If you service in accordance with LR's schedule, you can realistically expect trans problems before 200K and diff/transfer case failure by 300K. LR worked hard to make the D3/D4/RRS reliable, then stuffed it all up with a laughable (unless you're the owner) service schedule that their dealers unfortunately still take for gospel.

    As for the engines, the V8 does seem more reliable, goes like a raped ape and sounds awesome!

    But, since I'm always in the TDV6 camp, it's only fair for me to talk about something I know reasonably well - the TDV6 is a great engine - it is reliable and will go WAY beyond 300K, BUT ONLY if it is maintained on time by someone who knows what they're doing. They have a comparatively large number of very simple things that an inept mechanic can easily get wrong.
    1. the oil filter has a spigot on it that needs to be located into a little hole in the filter housing, THEN the filter cap screwed down onto it. Mechanics get this wrong by first inserting the filter into the cap (it comes off this way) and screwing them both down onto the housing. The spigot, which is part of the filter's output, doesn't locate into the hole this way, and jams itself against the housing, cutting off oil pressure and (most times) killing the motor. The 3.0 has a redesigned filter that is more intuitive to install.
    2. The correct spec oil absolutely must be used. The crank bearings are tabless and are especially reliant on this. Oil service 10-12K km is sufficient. LR has suggested 25K in some markets, which is WAY too long for this engine.
    3. The oil pump has the timing belt tensioner mount incorporated into it. On earlier design (pre MY10 models) oil pumps, this mount can fatigue crack and shear off, causing the timing belt to release = dead engine. Most indy mechanics will not change the belt without changing the pump to the latest design too, which is a good mitigation for potential failure. LR dealers however, anticipating a class action I guess, officially do not recognise the problem.
    4. Both timing belt tensioners use small diameter bolts that need to be torqued to 24nm - not very tight! It doesn't seem tight enough, which is why some mechanics torque the bolt higher than this just on tuition. This can cause the bolt to fail, releasing the timing belt. For the HPFP belt at least, the engine will survive, but you still have to remove the body to extract the dead bolt.
    5. The HPFP on MY07 and later models underwent several revisions before they got it right (november 2010 revision) the earlier versions had issues where diesel could leak onto the turbine housing and start a fire.
    6. The turbo can be a problem on 'school run' cars that rarely do much mileage or hard work. Trouble is, the body has to come off to remove it. If you are a contortionist with the strength of a gorilla though, apparently it can be done with the body on.
    7. Plastic water outlet has already been mentioned. It develops leaks after 100K and will eventually blow apart under pressure, causing your coolant to disappear rapidly! If you have your music on flat out (which I do quite a lot) you might not notice the little "i>" on the dashboard stating "LOW COOLANT LEVEL"
    8. On all the models, make sure you buy one which has had a trans service before 150K. Preferably before 100K! Save yourself learning about trans problems the hard way.
    I know this all sounds scary, but you asked for no bs - don't be too deterred - if you're the kind of person who does a lot of mileage and long trips, if you get a TDV6 that has been maintained properly, you'll love it, it's a great little engine with loads of torque, plenty of character, great economy (9.0-9.5 LHK real world for my 08 RRS with road tires and no offroad mods) and reliable if serviced by a meticulous person. As far as capable off-roaders go, I'll go one further and say there are no better diesel engines out there than the LR TDV6/TDV8. My TDV6 suits me because I regularly do long trips and my daily work trip is 55km each way, I do 50,000km+ per year and I am meticulous in doing my own work on it.

    If I did a lot of school run style driving, only took it out on trips occasionally and had basic mechanical skills only however, I would definitely get the V8 over the diesel. The diesel doesn't appreciate short trips!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    People keep on saying the diesels are more expensive to service than the petrols. With one caveat I would dispute that. In normal day to day use and servicing I doubt there is much difference - similar lubricants etc.

    The caveat is due to the diesels having rubber bands which need replacement every 160,000km or 7 years - can be relatively cheap or expensive depending on who does it. Given the large interval between changes this may or may not be an issue for an owner.

    When you take the substantially better fuel consumption of the diesels over the petrols the savings probably more than pays for belt changes.

    So I would say it is a draw and the through life expenses for both type of engines probably balances out.

    So buy the engine that suits you best.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Brisbne
    Posts
    631
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ill throw my 2c in.

    i recently purchased a 2008 D3 TDV6 with 180,000 on the clock, drives brilliantly (only an s model so coil springs) engine pulls well, cant feel the trailer on the back, has a good service history behind it, only thing missing is the timing belts have not been done, though reading about oil pump failures when timing belts are done, im glad it hasnt been so i can do it properly myself knowing its been doen right.

    ive had some fault code issues that seem to have now dissapeard that the car is getting regularly used and battery voltage maintained, I attribute the issues i was having to the battery voltage staying too low due to sitting in the car yard for so long un driven.

    I average about 10.5-11l/100km driving around town on stock size tires with winch and bullbar. I do occasionally give it a good boot in the guts to get it moving also, so they may be able to return better economy than my town driving with a lead foot

    Leroy.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    773
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mmm Beer Holders ... haha ... they've never met a beverage they couldn't contain ! My kids call them champagne holders ... I just put latte in them mostly.

    Your raped ape comment cracks me up every time Rich ! I would say they are surprisingly quick for a 3T vehicle and when coupled with good Disco handling they can give normal cars a surprise on twisty roads. Also, there is nothing quite like the sound of a sweet V8 when it get's working hard out in the bush ...

    The plastic cooling system parts are woeful on all models it seems. Mine has sprung another seepage from the stupid t-peice bleeder on top of the motor (brand new part fails to seal after 12mths) so I've got a new one to put in and am going to get someone to make me up one that actually works properly at some point.

    So I would say it is a draw and the through life expenses for both type of engines probably balances out.
    I think I agree with Garys comment above - the reality is that the vast bulk of Discos are diesel and therefore we hear most about their issues which are often related to some of the things that Rich has mentioned. I have no idea how long the V8 will last, there are some UK/US ones on the high side of 300km, but as they are rarer here I don't know how they go with really big mileage.

    As a general comment, you'd find most V8's are a higher spec (SE or HSE) and that they've generally been used as commuter / road vehicles and often have significantly less km's for the money. I personally don't think that road / commuting use does them any less harm than using them in harsher conditions as LR intended. To be honest, my fuel economy is really quite good for such a big heavy vehicle - my long term average is aprox 13.5L/100km, can be as low as 10 on the open road and as bad as 18/20 if driven harshly and used for a lot of short trips (which I avoid - thats what my other cars are for). Gets way better economy than my 6.0L Holden, that's for sure.

    I regard my vehicle as very reliable, albeit very high maintenance. That said, mine is almost 10 years old, has only been on a tow truck once (wheel bearing) in it's life and most years the annual running costs (maintenance/servicing) would be in the order of $2K. There were one or two years where it was $5K+ (suspension quest, compressor, exhaust system) but I think that is to be expected with such a complex and heavy vehicle with such a wide span of capabilities. And as I said in my post above, (in my opinion and my wife agrees) mine compares very well with brand new modern vehicles of many different types - it is tight as a drum, doesn't rattle, is quiet, smooth, very comfortable, reasonably powerful, easy to drive, easy to park and easy to live with. Also mine sounds better than any new car I drove, bar none, and the AJ-V8 is a much nicer motor than your average Holden/Ford V8 (technology vs displacement) - all imo of course. I reckon you'd be able to say all of this, more or less, about any good D3 irrespective of the power plant.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Epic pooh View Post
    I have no idea how long the V8 will last, there are some UK/US ones on the high side of 300km, but as they are rarer here I don't know how they go with really big mileage.
    I also frequent the US Range Rover Sport sites - in the US there are no diesels and certainly with the RRS only have the V8.

    They certainly have issues - not a lot but they are not totally fault free - probably on par with the diesels here.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    773
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The reality is that no motor is fault free and no manufacturer is perfect !

    As I said in a post above, they're all good motors depending on your personal preference and how you use them. I am personally a whore for V8 motors and I think mostly in terms of range not economy because I do pretty low KM's per annum in my own vehicles (and I have a little town car with a tiny little motor for, er, eco-creds ... haha). Also compared to my earlier Rover motor LR's (3.5 and 4.0) and some of the Chevs I've had over the years, the AJ-V8 is like a Prius !

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Coolum
    Posts
    188
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Could this be mainly due to supercharge variants

    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I also frequent the US Range Rover Sport sites - in the US there are no diesels and certainly with the RRS only have the V8.

    They certainly have issues - not a lot but they are not totally fault free - probably on par with the diesels here.


    I would guess that the majority would be thebig HP version of the 300HP Aussie version. It is often the case when you stick a great big supercharger onto a motor, add high/er compression and take into consideration the effects these have on general engine wear - you are bound to see related problems surface. That may well never be the issue without these excessive forces.


    We all recognise the USA of A do things bigger and better than (us) mere mortals - and they are more likely to stick the boot in more often than we dare in the nanny state


    However, with these issues removed - I wonder how the V8 really fairs - I will search to see if there are in fact any 'known' issues that would benefit from a few dollars worth of preventative maintenance at the next service.?


    Steve

  8. #18
    pinko001 Guest
    this is such a quality community. you blokes offer time and wisdom that is pure gold for the likes of me with no idea. thank you all so much.

    as for useage, i walk to work. the main drag is one click down the road. kids to school, footy training etc is a 2 min drive.
    weekends- to footy about 100km each way. but,

    then we go on hols a few times a year. 700 km each way. loaded to the hilt, canoe and crap on the roof. no tow. to the big smoke once a month 500km.

    want to explore the snowys with confidence. want the confidence to get anywhere i want. (obviously taking into account driving skill and conditions etc)

    im not a mechanic. if i venture in there i always drop a screw down in the engine bay and it takes me 20 mins to find the thing. never have the right tool. hopeless.

    the v6 is relatively cheap. if its not a complete dog, and it appears not to be, it mounts a strong case. but the sound and grunt of a v8...

    the missus is pushing for a pajero. reckons we cant afford to keep d3 on the road. at 2k/yr servicing and maintenance im thinking shes not far off the mark. the japs do the r factor. reliable. the poms do the x factor. what the x stands for id leave up to you.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Coolum
    Posts
    188
    Total Downloaded
    0

    throw in resale?

    Remember that a lot of the depreciation has fallen from the D3 so you are buying at the right time ..
    Pajeros are all of a sudden worth less than a set of tyres.
    A mate just bought a Pajero only a few years old for very little .. but I would add that he will get very much more of little when he sells it.
    Also have a look on the Pajero forum and you will see many more pitfalls than we have here.
    They are a nice package too but they do have known issues like all second hand 4WD's.
    Its my belief that Discos are well engineered - over and above anything else on the market.
    2 bobs worth
    Steve.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pinko001 View Post
    at 2k/yr servicing and maintenance im thinking shes not far off the mark. the japs do the r factor. reliable. the poms do the x factor. what the x stands for id leave up to you.
    Not sure where this 2k/yr serviceing comes from?? A Pajero will be a similar cost to the D3 to maintain and service and a Pajero is no more reliable.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!