I've driven nearly all of them all - D4 2.7, D4 2.7 remapped (to 170kW), D4 3.0 6 speed, D4 5.0 v8, D4 3.0 6 speed, D4 3.0 TDV6 8 speed and D4 3.0 SDV6 8 speed - the biggest difference between them all IMHO is the 8 speed!![]()
Smacks of someone trying to sell their LP 3.0 by denegrating the HP 3.0.
MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa
The main issue with the 3.0l were the turbos,a few threads on here about them.Body off job
Crank and bearing issue was the 2.7,D3.
The D4 2.7 has a different crank.
Most of the early 3.0 turbo problems were due to LR not discontinuing the use of the scavenger pump for the secondary's drain soon enough when Jaguar had dispensed with it before LR started using the 3.0. Mine unnecessarily had the body off to have a turbo replaced and was lining up for another prior to me fitting the Jaguar drain pipe.
MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa
Towing a 2.4 tonne caravan, I got 11.9 litres per 100km. At about 94KMH. At 104, I got 13. At a mix of 110 and less, I got 13.7.
With the 8 speed SD motor.
With 10K on it. It might get even better I'm told. Amazing motor.
I've been told to map it - not sure I need the extra go, any advise?
I'd say if you are happy with the current power.... why fiddle with it?
I know I won't bother with mine...
Mark
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most![]()
2015 TDV6 D4.... the latest project... Llams, Traxide, Icom 455, Tuffant Kimberleys and Mofos.... so far.
2012 SDV6 SE D4 with some stuff... gone...
2003 D2a TD5...gone...
2000 D2 V8...gone...
https://bymark.photography
Thanks for the thread have enjoyed the comments.
I now know a little more about my Disco 4.SDV6 HSE. then I did before
it has enough power for me to handle at my age
Thanks Kev
I know someone though with an SD who had his ECU optimised; I think Ritter have the same optimisation available. Its from a NSW LR tuner ... he was wrapped in the improvements in his vehicle.
I also know an ex GMH auto engineer, who bought a new VX 200 series Toyota, and one of the immediate changes he did was to chip his motor. I asked why he did and he said: Because I am an automotive engineer!
Evidently there can be power and fuel saving available, but I've only met one person whose actually done it. And he was very enthusiastic about it.
On the other hand, the tune of my 8 speed is quite clever I think. I've read that the turbo has some lag - but in fact I think the ECU restricts performance when starting from stationary. I think this is perhaps done to save on differential and other driveline stress ... if LR allowed its torque to be there from stationary, IMO there would be a lot of stress on the drivetrain.
This is a bit off topic but there are more reasons to remap than extrapower.
I believe most manufactures will do what they can to provide the best tunefor a motor but they also have their hands tied to meet stringent emission regulations.The problem being the tune to meet the emission regulation may not be the besttune for the engine for power or economy.
It's a bit like Mitsubishi tritons and Australia's regulatory requirment for stability control. It seems Mitsubishi has designed the Triton to work with traction control that appied brakes to spinning wheels much like LR traction control does. Then to sell the vehilce in Australia, the regs here say a vehicle must have stability control so Mitsubishi install a system that the vehicle was never designed to work with. A simple stabilty control will just reduce engine power when any wheel spins X amount faster than another. The end result is when you are climbing a steep hill and a wheel starts to spin, traction control starts working and applies brakes to the spinning wheel to drive the wheel that still has traction. Then the after thought stability control sees the spinning wheel and kills engine power right when you need it.
I know it's hardly related to engine power but just an example of how a manufacturer sells a vehicle that is not really the best but they have comprimised to meet regulation. Suporting why I believe the tune a manufacture may not be the best tune but it's a tune to meet regulations.
Happy Days.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks