View Poll Results: Should RRS be moved to the other Range Rover models?

Voters
50. You may not vote on this poll
  • No: Leave the board as D3/D4/RRS

    18 36.00%
  • Yes: Move RRS to Range Rover

    9 18.00%
  • Yes: Make a new sub-board for L494 in Range Rover but leave L320 with D3/D4

    23 46.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Do we want to separate RRS from the D3/D4

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Discovery 1
    Discovery 2
    T5 Platform (in this main area anything generic to this platform can be posted)
    • D3 specific
    • D4 specific
    • RRS specific
    D7u Platform (in this main area anything generic to this platform can be posted)
    • L494 RRS
    Leave the D5 out until it is released, once that happens it could have it's own section with the L494 RRS.

    D1
    D2
    D3/D4/RRS
    Discovery Sport
    D5/L494 RRS

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,201
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Looks fair, perhaps just specify D3/D4/L320 RRS.

    I am now (well my wife is) in the L320 camp and feel best aligned with the current Disco cohort. I'm not sure there'd be the critical mass for a separate RRS forum either.

    And yes, I miss the picnic table/work bench tailgate, and cargo space. And the 720kg payload...
    Now 2016 D4 HSE 'Leo' and Steve the Triumph Speed Twin
    Then 2010 D4 3.0 HSE 'James'
    Then 2010 RRS TDV8 'Roger' w traxide DBS, UHF, Cooper Zeons, Superchips remap
    Then 2010 D4 TDV6 'Jumbo' w traxide DBS
    First love 2002 D2 TD5 'Disco Stu'

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    SW Victoria
    Posts
    132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thinking about things some more, the essential stuff, the running gear and the electrickery is quite similar between D4 and current RRS. The body structure is different yes but how much discussion is generated within the forum about this, its usually motors gearboxes wheels, and oh electric stuff. The differences between D3 and D4 folk seem to cope with OK. There is a lot of common interest, at least for me, to the current D3 D4 RRS area. Is it neccessary to seperate the RRS at all?

    There isn't a whole lot of traffic in the current L494 area.

    The Discovery Sport is different kettle of fish as it is effectively a completely different car growing from the Freelander and Evoque with only the name and maybe some performance being the same as the D3 D4 RRS.

    Just thinking, Simmo 2014 RRS TDV6

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    30
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I wish there were more sub headings inside the Discovery 3/4 section, as in other car forums there are sub heading for,

    electrical
    drive line
    wheels and tyres
    engine
    protection

    ETC.

    I find it very hard to find specific topics in the jumble that is our little sub heading.

    I try searching but I also find the engine useless due to it give too many unrelated threads.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Wow can you imagine that here?

    There have been more than thirty different engines, many of which were used in multiple vehicle models (e.g. Defender, Disco and Range Rover) at the same time.

    IMHO The forum would be unworkable, you'd never be able to find what you want.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    There are four times as many members advocating no change or adding L494 to Range Rover than there are advocating moving L319 RRS to Range Rover (18/23 Vs 9).

    Not that we're a democracy in AULRO but the numbers have spoken.

    There is already an area for the L494 Range Rover http://www.aulro.com/afvb/l405-l494-range-rover/ so we'll not be changing anything.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!