Hmmm, the fuel tank replacement is a bit of a story:
I first tried to clean out and back-flush the original pump and halo-filter -- which was a moderate success. I replaced the pump into the tank, and then installed the tank back into the vehicle. This was the first effort made after the flooding.
The original pump ran up and was measured as delivering 80ps from an external gauge fitted inline with the fuel rail. This powered the vehicle for about 10 minutes on its first test drive but began to run lean and stumble. I first thought that this was caused by a shortage of fuel (hence the fuelling up), but after filing up with gas (petrol) at the fuel station, she stalled on her way out of the station. After the vehicle quit on me in the middle of lights, she started back up again after a few seconds but turning off the key and turning it back on again (though I did not know I was resetting anything at the time). She only had enough power to get me back to the shop. The following morning, we tried the car again, and she started and drove fine and we again tested the vehicle with the fuel pressure gauge inline. The gauge read 80psi, but as the vehicle started to become lean, the fuel pressure gauge lost pressure. However, all this happened within the first 5 minutes, and while still in the yard. We presumed the pump repair and cleaning had not gone well, and sought a second pump.
Sourcing a second hand fuel pump was possible and I found a 2006 donor, but when the tank arrived, it was clear that the pump and tank were different. The donor vehicle had been fitted with a 2010 tank and pump after a recall was issued on certain vin numbers. We were given the entire tank, fuel pump, electric harness and all of the evap. pipes and fuel lines. It is this tank and pump (which are not interchangeable) which is currently fitted to the vehicle -- not the original tank. The donor tank was placed into the vehicle and the fuel pressure was inspected before the vehicle was taken out of the shop; the inline fuel pressure gauge measured 80psi at idle in neutral. It is possible that the gauge is slightly out, but not excessively as it is a Snap On kit.
What is interesting from all of this, is that the first tank and cleaned pump, presented with similar symptoms (but more severe and happening sooner) than the second tank. The second tank was selected also, in part, due to the difficulty of washing out the first tank to remove the clay like sediment which would be in all of the weird baffles and plastic tubes shown in your diagram above.
Of further interest:
Tonight's test run was conducted with little fuel in the tank, and after re-cleaning the throttle body and the MAF sensor. It was only 15 degrees outside and the vehicle drove seamlessly for 50 miles without any fault presenting. However, coming into the next town the vehicle started faintly hesitating, and I turned around only for the vehicle to quit on me fully as I accelerated out of the town on the highway. Having switched off the vehicle and re-started it, I was able to drive 50 miles home before any further symptoms presented. The fuel temperature reached 63degrees, and the ECM temperatures were also normal -- The only difference between tonight's and last night's test runs, are the external temperature, and the cleaner MAF sensor -- yet last night I struggled to drive 25km after 10 minutes idling, and tonight I idled for 20 minutes and drove 80km before symptoms occurred.
I hope this information is helpful to you all -- though I am sensitive to your position on too greater fuel pressure, I find it difficult to understand why too much pressure (which is maintained by the pressure regulators inside the tank and pump) would sometimes permit the car to drive for 2 hours or more, and sometimes only 25 minutes.
There does seem to be an ambient air temperature correlation: The more fuel in the tank, the longer the time taken for issues to present. The colder the ambient air, the longer it takes for symptoms to present.
After speaking to a friend in the UK, I have ordered a new MAF sensor (hence the re-cleaning tonight) -- but after tonight's performance, I am reluctant to believe it is the MAF. Indeed, I have ordered a CPS as well as a MAF, but I cannot actually source any other relevant sensors in the US other than the throttle position sensor (which I am reluctant to try at $591).


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks