Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: 18" D697 noise

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LRD414 View Post
    I run 265/60/R18 and still have one D697 as the spare.
    I haven't had the KO2s long enough for a complete/full comparison (~8k km) across all my usage types (city/highway/4WD track/outback roads/beach)

    The KO2s are noisier from new until the D697s get fairly worn and then they make a similar noise too.
    It's a typical harmonic type hum at 50-60 kph especially on coasting.
    I don't find it annoying or intrusive from either tyre but it is there.

    Both tyres have excellent manners on bitumen, both highway driving and city driving. I haven't experienced any tram-tracking.

    Offroad. I haven't had the KO2s on for outback touring yet but am hopeful we will get a trip in this year.
    This will be a very interesting comparison I think because the D697s really excelled for touring, although I didn't get the same life as others report.

    However, I have done a few 4WD'ing trips and used the KO2s on a range of track terrains from scrabbly to rocky to sandy and a little bit of mud.
    The KO2s traction in all these situations has been very impressive and I think better than the D697s although I'd say that's still a bit subjective at this stage.
    They have handled some pretty sharp rocky sections with barely a mark, which the D697s did as well.

    There was a $150/tyre cost difference when I was looking so that is something else that comes in to play.

    While I was happy with the 697s the only way to really compare is to do it yourself and I didn't want to die wondering.
    If the KO2s handle outback touring like the D697s then they will probably get the overall win due to offering better traction in scrabbly situations.

    Cheers,
    Scott
    Hi Scott any update on how your tyres are going??

    On my RRS (18" wheels) I have had General Grabber AT (not AT2) on for 68,000km and have worn really well - main tread is Ok and good for another 10,000km but the inner !" are bald. They are not a LT and handled mud really well but in harder terrain the sidewalls are clearly taking a bit of the load - no punctures but lots of rock scrape marks. I run them at 20 offroad and have not had to go lower. So have been OK offroad and Ok onroad but have an annoying hum louder than the roof rack. So I am looking for something new.

    The car is now 10 years old, so not as nice as it once was and I am happy to be a bit more adventurous offroad. So now looking at LT265/60 R 18 ATs so the BFG ATs and the Bridgestone D697s are on the list. I have been quoted $320 for the D697s and $440 for the BFGs so a bit of difference in price.

    The salesman said the BFGs are a bit noisy but was not sure of the D697. My old Freelander had 16" BFG AT KOs on it and they were a bit noisy but were a good tyre. Like most people I do spend most of my time on the bitumen so a quiet (or as quiet as possible) is important. The salesman also tried to get me onto the Dick Cepek offroad range but I dont know them and am not prepared to be the guinea pig and try something I am not sure of.

    So how have your tyres lasted and how do you now think the BFGs compare to the old D697s - particularly taking into account the nearly $500 difference in price - noting you do get a free Swag when you buy 4 BFGs. (but I dont want a swag)

    If anyone else has had a good run in an other LT 18"AT please let me know.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #32
    Tombie Guest
    Garry. Have a look at Monsta also. There’s people on here running them..

    Proving very nice @ ~$200 a corner

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes I noticed the discussion on them in another thread. Certainly cheap but there is a comment about them being a little noisy which does concern me a little. However the BFGs and Bridgestones also are a bit noisy. Also the only LT in 18" is the 285/60R18 which is too big.

    I will have a chat with Ozzy Tyres the local sellers about them tomorrow. They currently list them at $183 plus fitting and balancing so I guess up around $200 a corner.

    Cheers

    garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    A very slight whine but hardly noticeable Garry, can't be beat for the price.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm looking forward to fitting 265/60r18 D697's this weekend. They are certainly coming down in price.... got them for $280 a tyre which was a no brainer compared to what BFG are asking for their AT.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    466
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting discussion. I have just changed out the 697's for KO2's based on the closeness of the price between both brands here in Adelaide. The 265/60/18" 697's have done >60,000km, most of that towing either our Ultimate or the new Q+ and about 65% of the distance off bitumen. No punctures and great wear all round. BTW they are marked as LT on the sidewall and my Bridgestone engineer is adamant they perform at that level and our experience is they do.

    But the clincher for change, after 15 years of using Bridgestone tyres on our 4WDs was our local BJTM got the KO2's F&B for $415. For me that was enough incentive to make the change and see if they are as good as some seem to think. I have a good friend with them on his D4 and have been guided a lot by his positive feedback as well.

    Heading to the High Country late Nov for the Victorian AOR Rally so will be a good opportunity to see how they perform on and off bitumen.

    Rob
    Rob

    MY15 TDV6. Compomotives with KO2's, Traxide 160-DBMS, Llams, OE bar, custom rear storage slide, Rhino roof storage system, LSM TPMS, ICOM 440N, rear ladder and GOE compressor guard

  7. #37
    LRD414's Avatar
    LRD414 is offline Super Moderator Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,737
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Hi Scott any update on how your tyres are going??
    I'm up to approx 28k on the KO2s now & I haven't measured tread depth but at a guess I'd say around half worn or maybe slightly better than that. Their performance has been excellent for everything I've thrown at them. I expected worse damage after some of the fast rocky roads but they are holding up well. So at this stage I intend to go with KO2s again because their traction in slow/technical offroad situations is excellent and subjectively better than the D697s (very difficult to be scientific about that).

    However, if the offroad usage was to be dominated by touring type work where low speed traction is less critical then I would probably go back to the D697s (assuming D697 was cheaper, which I haven't checked recently). Having seen what LT tyres can cope with I would never get anything else so doubt I'll be looking beyond KO2 & D697, although if the Monsta continues to get favourable feedback ....

    Noise is so subjective that all I can say is the KO2s have stayed the same, low hum at 50-60 that still doesn't bother me and can hardly hear it as soon as the stereo goes on (even low volume).

    Cheers,
    Scott

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Got the D697's fitted yesterday and confirm that there is no more noise than the Nexan HT tyres that were on there beforehand, so very happy with that.

    Got 265/60r18 replacing 255/50r20 so only slightly taller but in an LT. No noticeable impact on rolling resistance, unlike the STT Pro's in 275/65r18 which do make a noticeable difference in low speed driveability around town (even with the 3.0 SDV6). STT's will now be going on to the steel rims when available...

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for the comments - so it seems they all seem to work pretty well - I guess it comes down to cost (value for money). It certainly does not seem that the BFGs perform $120 a tyre more than the Bridgestones.

    Cheers

    garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    282
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have had a set of KO2''s on my D4 since new ( done 42,000km ) and as previously discussed with Scott on another thread, yes they do have a drone between 45 - 60 km/h - especially on the over run. They emit the same amount of noise when they were brand new to now ( 42,000 km ).

    Anyway a few weeks ago I quizzed the technical rep at the BF Goodridge stand at the Melbourne 4WD describing the noise in detail, and told him exactly the same noise had been emitted from the same tyres ( KO2 ) fitted to other D4 owners on this forum. The rep said that yes this can happen on certain model vehicles and the way the wheel / suspension geometry is designed, and the same tyres would not necessarily make the same noise on other vehicles. The rep basically said that changing the wheel alignment or altering the tyre pressure would not eliminate the noise, as the noise comes from movement of air with in tyre , and not contact of rubber with the road surface.

    I am not sure if this explanation is true or BS, but must admit the annoying noise doesn't sound like scrubbing with the road surface.

    Apart form this annoying drone 60 -45 km/h I am very happy with the tyres - on and off road. On the bitumen I run front and rear at 40 PSI cold.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!