And it's not even that good of a replica. Sits about an inch lower. I don't think it would be that easy to split the sockets cover and refit, due to the wider lower flange. I reckon with all the gussets on it, it's just big and ugly.
Mitch Hitch for me. Much neater. Even more so now with the new ones losing the top gusset.
Cheers, Mungus.
_________________
MY14D4HSE, Nara Bronze, E-Diff, Vision Assist, Surround Cameras, LLAMS, ProSpeed Sliders/Compressor plate, Mitch Hitch,
ARB Summit Bar, Runva 11XP, Traxide D3-DU, GOE Comp. Rims, D697 265/60R18, Rijidij RWC, Fyrlyts.
 Wizard
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						Subscriber Master
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Master
					
					
						SubscriberThe normal way is to make profits while a product is new; then when competition appears, you have to add marketing costs and you loose profit margins. But you make money from continuing research into other areas and hence introducing new products which are more profitable.
When a company has a Cash Cow, then such products or services are golden, but IMO I want to pay for good quality and functionality rather than pay a premium for a good design that occurred some considerable time ago.
If you cannot patent a design, then you're going to have to compete by another means. That's what free enterprise is all about. As an example, there are tyre treads from some companies that resemble tread patterns from other companies. Innovations and improvements on alls sorts of technologies in motor vehicles cross from one brand to another.
China is questionable for many reasons - I think its too off topic. I've been an agent for several overseas companies for decades, including Taiwanese and Chinese (and Swiss, German and Italian), and I'd have little trust for Chinese steel for a tow bar, because of the practice of Chinese business's to outsource, and the way they source their materials, which can be very ad-hoc. As far as the workmanship goes of metal goods, I have much more faith in Australian than Chinese.
I'd have expected something like a Hitch to be good value if made by the original designer, whose made many before, and hence has worked out how to make it efficiently. That I read about requiring a grinder to fit a $730 Hitch to a recent Disco, I also question how current the design is.
Just to clear some things up, the Mitch Hitch was designed by Mitchell Bros in Brookvale(northern beaches of Sydney) they are using a new manufacturer with a slightly different design, apparently some of the old design were failing, hence the new design.
Now the original manufacturer are still making the old design for someone else, this is the copy that people are talking about.
This is what I have been told.
Cheers Baz.
2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
2007 BMW R1200GS
1979 BMW R80/7
1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow
 Master
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Master
					
					
						SubscriberThanks Baz.
Doug
Just a clarification. The grinding is only to the inner surface of the recovery eye casting. The surface is rough due to the typical defects you get with a simple casting. However, the eye is fitted with a poly bush for the Mitch Hitch. You are basically just cleaning up the surface so the bush fits neatly.
Scott
D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
Link to my D4 Build Thread
D3 2005 V8 Petrol
Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.
I wasn't told that. They use to make them in house but demand was to much to handle so out sourced the manufacturing. They had a falling out with said manufacturer and the replacment didn't meet the standards they wanted. They have finally found a company to manufacture there hitch to there standards.
I believe its the original manufacturer they had that was selling behind their back. If the new hitches are different it would only makes sence to have a difference to distinguish between the two. Either way some ***** has done the dirty on a family company.
So,do these copied versions come with the correct rating plackard saying they meet ADRs????
When its time to buy Im happy to get a legal hitch rather than a copied illeagal hitch.
Andrew
DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
I made the 1 millionth AULRO post
...and at least it would be the poly bush that wore over time and not the tow eye. The other one uses metal spacers. I actually sway toward the tapered poly bush design.
From what I have researched, the website for the new knock off one states it is ADR compliant and from discussing with another member I think it comes with a sticker to put on the door pillar. Mitch Hitch have confirmed to me in correspondence that their product is ADR compliant and another member has shown me it comes with a plate attached.
Cheers, Mungus.
_________________
MY14D4HSE, Nara Bronze, E-Diff, Vision Assist, Surround Cameras, LLAMS, ProSpeed Sliders/Compressor plate, Mitch Hitch,
ARB Summit Bar, Runva 11XP, Traxide D3-DU, GOE Comp. Rims, D697 265/60R18, Rijidij RWC, Fyrlyts.
Cheers Baz.
2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
2007 BMW R1200GS
1979 BMW R80/7
1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks