No, the torque is peaking at about 575 ft lbs, which is about 780Nm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatsouthernland
Printable View
No, the torque is peaking at about 575 ft lbs, which is about 780Nm.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatsouthernland
Mmmmm
It is, there are two red lines and two green lines. I'm reading it as being the two green lines are pre-remap, and the two red lines are post remap. One line for power curve, one for torque.Quote:
Originally Posted by Babs
So the lower of the two red lines is the post remap torque curve, to be read against the right hand axis.
It looks like it's about 530flb which is 718.5nm
Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner
No you got your numbers wrong. It is about 710nm and works out at about 220kw at flywheel which equates nicely with current model RRS SDV6. A nice little increase SWMBO likes it[emoji106] cost was a bit more than their standard quote for a D3/4 as my exhaust had to be modified from D3/4 plus I went ceramic coating.
[emoji3] I was replying to 1000nm post[emoji3] but yes two green are pre map two red post map.
Ballpark $$ ? You should feel That increase in the middle of your back
Ballpark is $1450 for ECU and same again for their standard 409 S/S exhaust.
Is the trip computer giving you any hints on likely economy?
Are you noticing any difference in gear changes? I guess they're somewhat independent.
Computer is showing an improvement in fuel economy by about 0.2 L/100ks so is better with more power. Re gear change while I don't think they have changed you can really hear them now. The engine note now means you can very clearly hear every change. I don't mind it it sounds less " anetheatised " than factory where aim was least NVH with minimum loss of power. But does it go better? Hell yeah:)