 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						So far I'm very happy with mine in 265/60/R18 (~7,000km).
There is a resonant type hum between 50 & 60kph particularly on overrun but I don't find the noise to be intrusive or annoying.
The Bridgestone D697s were less noiser until quite worn & then they were similar for noise.
Traction on the tracks around Lithgow & some local tracks has been excellent in the dry. Pressures at 26/28.
I have no experience in the wet on them yet, other than wet bitumen on which they have been fine.
Too early to say regarding wear long-term but signs are good so far.
For around the city and long trips I have been running 40/42 and sometimes 40/44
Regards,
Scott
D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
Link to my D4 Build Thread
D3 2005 V8 Petrol
Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.
Mike, I would remove the copper grease and use a nickel-based product instead.
Copper doesn't go well with alloy and over time it's possible you'll get galling between hub and wheel.
There is a lot of conflicting info about this but I think easy enough to use nickel or even lanolin grease to avoid any risk.
And also more photos of the silver compomotives please. You don't see too many ....
Regards,
Scott
D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
Link to my D4 Build Thread
D3 2005 V8 Petrol
Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.
i noticed on tyresales.com.au that the KO2's come in 2 different load ratings - 117 and 122 - and for marginal differences in price.
would going the higher load rating make any material difference in sidewall strength? any other reasons why this would be a factor to consider?
cheers
Brian
Hi mate, thinking of joining the fat tyre brigade hey.
For me, there were three reasons:
- zero rubbing in any situation or issues if vehicle drops to bump stops
- fit a fully inflated spare under vehicle
- stay close enough to factory size (775 vs 763 OD) to use one 19" as a 2nd spare in an emergency situation
I've since learnt that the bump stop issue is for older models anyway and I believe the later model bump stop would prevent locking of the wheel in the wheel well with 265/65/R18. However, at the time this wasn't clear and I suppose still isn't in that I haven't seen it tested definitively.
The deflated spare is not a show-stopper just a bit painful.
I have tested the 19" 2nd spare scenario and no errors thrown but not something I would run long-term. However, I am now favouring sourcing a cheap 18" rim and having the 2nd spare as a properly matching diameter to the main five, so that reason becomes somewhat redundant.
Since my selection I have been offroad with friends who run 265/65/R18 KO2s and I haven't detected any real world difference. Of course they have slightly better clearance and slightly better sidewall height so there will eventually be a situation where they are better off but not to date. Neither size stops cosmetic wheel damage.
What would I choose next time? Not sure really. Bigger is better in some ways but there doesn't seem to be much in it in my experience.
Cheers,
Scott
D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
Link to my D4 Build Thread
D3 2005 V8 Petrol
Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks