Tombie, would not air trapped in vehicle tank use less fuel for the fill up, resulting in improved fuel consumption figures (less fuel for same kM).
Regardless of such variables that may be thrown into the equations after some 22 consecutive refuelling stops and data many errors are minimised and certainly not resulting in a understandable average 17% error.
Volume change relative to temperature very minor. A further comment of wheel size was previously raised, which I disregard as it is the same wheel diameter, same driving manner etc used for both the vehicle and real life calcs using bowser litres.
I have previously set up a MoTeC engine management system which provided a fuel consumption readout. This was based on injector flow rate, # of injectors, fuel pressure and on time of the injectors. This was with accurate to < 1%.
I can only conclude LR make a conscientious effort to make fuel consumption figures look good, to the extent of 15-20%.


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks