Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: Brakes on 3.0 vs 2.7

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,700
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shanegtr View Post
    You seen the current hilux and previous model moose swerve tests on you tube? I dont think Toyota really gives a rats arse about the test
    Why, why why does LR have to be teacher's pet then.

    Likewise on that basis when fitting Compomotive 18"s it is defeating the manufacturers design no more/less than changing back to the 2.7D discs and calipers? What is the exact law that is being broken?

    Agree - not a D3/D4 thing.

    Moral of the story - don't get anywhere near a LC200 with a tow as it is a wonder with their inferior braking system they can stop at all let alone swerve to miss you.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PerthDisco View Post
    Why, why why does LR have to be teacher's pet then.

    Likewise on that basis when fitting Compomotive 18"s it is defeating the manufacturers design no more/less than changing back to the 2.7D discs and calipers? What is the exact law that is being broken?

    Agree - not a D3/D4 thing.

    Moral of the story - don't get anywhere near a LC200 with a tow as it is a wonder with their inferior braking system they can stop at all let alone swerve to miss you.
    Not really,if you use the 18" size as per placard,very little changes,and is legal.

    Changing brake rotors to a smaller size, and calipers, is a massive change which may mean the vehicle has to be plated by a suitably qualified vehicle modifier,or it may be illegal.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes no logical reason to reduce brake size. the 2.7 brakes are just ok if using in a 'normal' duty cycle. It is certainly a welcome upgrade in the 3.0 models. I stuck the 4.2SC 360mm brembo fronts on my td6 as i tow a decent size van and car trailers etc from time to time. Can never have too big brakes 😎. Saying that i can still fit 19" rims, which so far haven't been any problem.

    Jc
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PerthDisco View Post
    The best argument I have seen is that the D4 calipers have a rib cast into them that block the fitting of an 18" wheel (other than Compomotive) to pass the Moose swerving test on low profile rubber. Don't know why does not apply also to LC200.
    The early alloy 3.0 rear calipers had blobs of metal protruding out the ends for no apparent reason other than to block the fitment of 18" rims but were later replaced with the D3's smaller, strictly functional cast iron calipers that allow 18" rims to fit (same as the V8 D3), presumably because the alloy calipers caused squealing in reverse when dusty.

    The 2 centre ribs on the front calipers protrude further out than the end 2 ribs. If a person is prepared to make the modification, the centre hump of these 2 ribs can be reduced a couple of mm to allow 18" rims to fit. IMO this is a better proposition these days than fitting 2.7 brakes to allow 17" rims due to the range of 18" tyres now available and that LR 18" rims now fit the rear.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    The early alloy 3.0 rear calipers had blobs of metal protruding out the ends for no apparent reason other than to block the fitment of 18" rims but were later replaced with the D3's smaller, strictly functional cast iron calipers that allow 18" rims to fit (same as the V8 D3), presumably because the alloy calipers caused squealing in reverse when dusty.

    The 2 centre ribs on the front calipers protrude further out than the end 2 ribs. If a person is prepared to make the modification, the centre hump of these 2 ribs can be reduced a couple of mm to allow 18" rims to fit. IMO this is a better proposition these days than fitting 2.7 brakes to allow 17" rims due to the range of 18" tyres now available and that LR 18" rims now fit the rear.
    When I measured it up I calculated that I had to remove about 10mm from the ribs on the front calipers to fit the OEM 18" wheels I have. The estimated shave is shaded RED in the attachment. My engineer would not sign off on this modification.

    Chris
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The end ribs are untouched and only 3-4mm off the highest points of the centre 2 ribs is all that is required.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If I can't find sufficiently durable, quieter tyres for my L322's 20" rims then I'll fit the front discs and slightly shaved calipers from the more powerful, faster accelerating, same GVM and towing capacity 5.0 L322 of the same year which uses the same caliper as the 3.0 D4, noting that the D3/D4 LR 18" rim already fits the rear.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Coolamon, NSW
    Posts
    783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    The end ribs are untouched and only 3-4mm off the highest points of the centre 2 ribs is all that is required.
    The end ribs actually do need about 1mm taken off, the centre two need about 2 -3 mm taken off, and the trailing edge of the front of the main body (leading up to the ribs) needs about 0.5mm taken off to provide enough clearance for a standard LR 18" wheel to turn without fouling.
    - Justin
    Selling soon - MY10 D4 3.0 TDV6 SE with E-Diff & LLAMS, 265/65R18 Maxxis Razr A/T
    Moved into MY12 L322 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography
    VK2HFJ

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,700
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Brakes on 3.0 vs 2.7

    So the question remains if those ribs are there solely to exclude 18" wheels from fitting? The amount of metal to be removed would not seem critical.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Coolamon, NSW
    Posts
    783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PerthDisco View Post
    So the question remains if those ribs are there solely to exclude 18" wheels from fitting? The amount of metal to be removed would seem critical.
    What i think may have haplened was they got the CAD file of the 2.7 caliper, then scaled the drawing x% to cope with larger discs and didn't care that 18" didn't fit anymore.
    - Justin
    Selling soon - MY10 D4 3.0 TDV6 SE with E-Diff & LLAMS, 265/65R18 Maxxis Razr A/T
    Moved into MY12 L322 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography
    VK2HFJ

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!