Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: New Oil Pump

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric SDV6SE View Post
    I understand this is the pump for the TDV6 2.7, does the 3.0SDV6 have a similar pump or the already stiffened design?

    I for one one would like to know what the running oil pressures are, approaching 200K kms on the original oil pump....
    The oil pump housing failure issue was only a 2.7 issue - mainly MY07/08 (approx build mid 06 to mid 08) but earlier also do fail from time to time.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,700
    Total Downloaded
    0

    New Oil Pump

    Is this the actual oil pump or the oil pump cover?

    Mine was replaced with water pump at time of timing belt change and was the old dodgy variety originally. MY08 model.

    That was done in about 2014 so that’s coming up again in next year or two.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is the oil pump - all one component - comprises the actual pump itself, the housing and seals etc.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ean Austral View Post
    So Dazza , have you found any transplanted territory engines have suffered crank failures due to the same poor build quality of the ford crankshaft ?

    I only ask as it seems most transplanted engines are coming from later model territory's and this could indicate that Ford did address the issue. In saying that I still see the odd post about late D4 engines failing due to crank failures so maybe they didn't fix it.

    Cheers Ean
    Absolutely spot on there with your thoughts and a dam valid question.

    *Did Ford with their "on the fly engineering" (as in fix it as you go) did they actually finally sort this issue.
    *Ive not found any info on the 2.7lt failing in a Territory.
    *Two Ford mechanics I know have never heard of a territory engine failing.
    *I use 2014 - 2016 spec engines, in the hope that all has been sorted. (2011 onwards is when the 2.7lt was available in the Territory).
    Regards
    Daz


  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    And yet they built the Lada so not all is engineered properly, can't find any reference to anyone that has fitted one .
    re lada, It was actually a Fiat design, I believe Fiat even built one of the factories in the old Russia.

    Its down fall was build quality (we all know about that right, dont we?).
    Regards
    Daz


  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101RRS View Post
    Well what do most fail from then?
    Most that I see are just like the pic I posted, spun bearings by the look.
    You will likely find that the crankshaft breakage is a end result of the above issue.
    Regards
    Daz


  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Few months back a bloke was selling an ex Territory TDV6 in pieces on gumtree but no idea how or why it failed.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just back on the Oil Pump thing...IMHO

    *The original oil pump assembly had a housing that wasnt moron proof.
    *The timing belt tensioner retaining bolt, bolts to the oil pump housing and is a small 10mm bolt with a torque setting of 25NM (from memory).
    *As pretty well all oil pump housing failures I have seen have been "just" after the timing belt was changed, I suspect the retaining bolt for the timing belt tensioner has been well over torqued past spec.
    *How does a "professional" stuff this up?
    *I suspect the torque wrench being used is likely a large 1/2 drive more suited to do head bolts on a truck rather than a small 10mm bolt in a alloy housing.
    *You would be surprised at how many mechanics that are just wages slaves (no offense intended) that dont have a good quality torque wrench, a number of torque wrenches, or none at all.
    *Often its the workshop that has a shop wrench everyone uses, they also may have a cheap branded one at that.
    *Using a large 1/2 drive click style torque wrench is overkill for a small 10mm bolt and torque settings will be well exceeded.

    The pic below: top torque wrench is a 1/2 drive "click" style that has a max torque of round 400NM, well suited for doing head bolts on an old engine.
    The bottom torque wrench is a 3/8 drive (smaller) is digital, has progressive LED on the side and sound. Its has the finesse and fine accuracy needed for such a job as timing belts.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Regards
    Daz


  9. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,543
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post
    Just back on the Oil Pump thing...IMHO

    *The original oil pump assembly had a housing that wasnt moron proof.
    *The timing belt tensioner retaining bolt, bolts to the oil pump housing and is a small 10mm bolt with a torque setting of 25NM (from memory).
    *As pretty well all oil pump housing failures I have seen have been "just" after the timing belt was changed, I suspect the retaining bolt for the timing belt tensioner has been well over torqued past spec.
    *How does a "professional" stuff this up?
    *I suspect the torque wrench being used is likely a large 1/2 drive more suited to do head bolts on a truck rather than a small 10mm bolt in a alloy housing.
    *You would be surprised at how many mechanics that are just wages slaves (no offense intended) that dont have a good quality torque wrench, a number of torque wrenches, or none at all.
    *Often its the workshop that has a shop wrench everyone uses, they also may have a cheap branded one at that.
    *Using a large 1/2 drive click style torque wrench is overkill for a small 10mm bolt and torque settings will be well exceeded.

    The pic below: top torque wrench is a 1/2 drive "click" style that has a max torque of round 400NM, well suited for doing head bolts on an old engine.
    The bottom torque wrench is a 3/8 drive (smaller) is digital, has progressive LED on the side and sound. Its has the finesse and fine accuracy needed for such a job as timing belts.
    In addition torque wrenches are grossly inaccurate at the lower end of their range. If mechanics are using high range wrenches on small low range bolts they will be overtightened. From what I have seen a lot of workshop mechanics mostly don't torque things to spec. they just use smaller or larger battery impact drivers depending on bolt size.
    I'm only a home mechanic but I own 6 torque wrenches. My largest is 3/4" drive with a maximum of 450nm and the smallest is 3/8" drive with a max of 17nm. I have such a wide range because I work my cars and my bikes, some of my bike suspension has 6mm threads on an alloy shaft which is very easily damaged.
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB Gone
    2023 Ford Ranga

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post

    *As pretty well all oil pump housing failures I have seen have been "just" after the timing belt was changed, I suspect the retaining bolt for the timing belt tensioner has been well over torqued past spec.
    Across a range of forums this also seems to be the prevailing view as well BUT there was was design issue without lack of reinforcing. There is almost no evidence of oil pump housing failures before the first cam belt change - ie the setup from the factory seems OK. There is heaps of evidence of the oil pump housing failures after the first cam belt change - usually within 20,000km.

    Now as a customer we should be able to rely on our mechanics to do the job right but clearly that is not the case in some cases - however to be fair there is clearly a design issue as PSA/Ford changed the design of the housing by putting the reinforcing in and kept the old part number - also 05/06MY oil pumps generally do not fail after a cam belt change (some have), there must have been a change for 07/08MY as this is is where most failures occur and was fixed for 09MY on (MYs are approximate only).

    Another aspect is that the new LR oil pump costs in the vicinity of $430 where the Ford oil pump costs around $180 and they are exactly te same part. I am sure some LR parts suppliers are buying their stock from Ford at Ford trade prices and then selling them at LR retail.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!