
Originally Posted by
ATH
I agree bits wear out but shouldn't it be the fibrous pads not metal discs? Yes the brakes are good, very good, but that doesn't excuse what I think is premature wear of a too soft component.
AlanH.
I suppose, theoretically, yes. But my guess is that the two components (disc and pad) are engineered for maximum effectiveness. The trade off is wear of the easily replaceable part (pad) and eventual wear of the more expensive part (disc). I suppose a clue to the designer's thinking is the relative ease of replacing discs on the D4, compared with, say, a Classic Rangie, where the whole hub had to be removed first. This indicates that the D4 discs are meant to be a regularly replaceable item.
2013 D4 expedition equipped
1966 Army workshop trailer
(previously SII 2.25 swb, SIII 2.25 swb & lwb, P38 Vogue, 1993 LSE 3.9V8 then HS2.8)
Bookmarks