Nope. Not even close. So much work that the 3.0 would be cheaper.
Different injection, different loom, different ECUs
Engines aren’t even same angle V!
You can get new cranks etc and go the rebuild option.
Printable View
For a 10 yr old vehicle would it be worth doing,economically?
The cost of the job would be not far off the value of the vehicle.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...f149ae3579.jpg
All other parts for a conventional rebuild are easily available.
Sure if the vehicle is low mileage,very good condition,DIY,makes sense.And if the owner wants to keep it for a few more years.
But presumably most at that type of age,many probably high K,s,are up for a lot more than just a crank and a couple of other parts.
Getting someone to do the job,would be well over $20K,so decisions need to made if it’s viable.
What is the vehicle worth,probably around $20 to $25K,less wholesale.And way less in a couple of years time.
It also depends on the owners own situation,financially and whatever else.
The rebuild option is getting more cost effective imho.
I would like this to be a financially viable option, the vehicle has some goodies; rear ediff arb front locker, long range tank etc but it has 260k on the clock
I don’t have the space and I don’t really have the skills to rebuild myself.
it’s going to be a tough decision, but there might be some stuff become available.