So Tombie carrying weight has no penalty? Lets all drive around with fully loaded up cars. And to make it even more realistic lets just add 3.5t low profile trailer (so there is no wind drag behind) and we can all get the same fuel economy!!!Come on get a grip. (sorry you might have a problem with one of your hands).
Also for some payback V convenience is a factor for some as my post did say, it is. For you its convenience and bugger the cost. For me the very few times its an inconvenience is far outweighed by the cost.
2016.5 TDV6 Graphite D4,Corris Grey,APT sliders,Goe air comp plate,UHF & HF radio,Airflow snorkel,Discrete Winch,Compo rims with 265/65/18 Wildpeak AT3W, LLAMs,Traxide dual battery,EAS emergency kit,Mitch Hitch EGR blank & delete,ECU remap
My fuel burn with the tank in and full is indistinguishable to that without. Always has been. There are way too many other variables to impact upon consumption.
The same 800km trip I’ve done countless times can see fuel burn as low as 10.1 and as high as 13l/100km. Almost always down to wind and traffic conditions. At least half those trips would be with the rear tank empty.
The weight penalty of 60kg of tank is not discernible on 3.08t of vehicle. My frontal presentation (drag), tyres I have on at the time and my right foot have far bigger influence.
2001 Disco 2 - EU3 TD5 Auto
(Build Date: 08/01)
Mods: 2" Lift, HD Springs, Rear Bags,
ECU upgrade, IC, Silicone Pipes, EGR, De-web,
Digital EGT, Boost & Trans, 160W Spots,
12000lb Winch, Icom UHF & Codan NGT HF
245 75R16 Toyo 'Open Country' M/T's
 TopicToaster
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						TopicToaster
					
					
						Subscriber| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks