Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: Tow Ball Download weight confusion with state legal

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mid North Coast, NSW
    Posts
    1,093
    Total Downloaded
    51.4 KB
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoJeffster View Post
    Weight distribution hitches are a no no on the Discos. I'm sure it says it in the manual somewhere
    I dont think it is mentioned anywhere, and its just a old wives tale that you cant use them. There is nothing special about them that the suspension would even experience or have to interact with, all it does is change the load experienced by the axles by making a stiffer joint at the hitch.

    no different to just having a heavier or lighter tow ball weight through normal means

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,752
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    I think that is to allow for the moron factor and people putting way to much pressure on them, Jeeps with the same air suspension set up have no issues using a WDH
    I remember reading an investigative report by a large, Australian, towing company, into caravan accidents, which basically stated that " If a WDH is required, then: 1) The tow vehicle is unsuitable. 2) The van is unsuitable. 3) The cargo distribution is incorrect. ".
    'sit bonum tempora volvunt'


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mid North Coast, NSW
    Posts
    1,093
    Total Downloaded
    51.4 KB
    Quote Originally Posted by Saitch View Post
    I remember reading an investigative report by a large, Australian, towing company, into caravan accidents, which basically stated that " If a WDH is required, then: 1) The tow vehicle is unsuitable. 2) The van is unsuitable. 3) The cargo distribution is incorrect. ".
    this is an idealistic take, id prefer to not use one simply from the point of view of it being less gear and process to hook up.

    but from a functionality point of view, they do actually work and are very popular and i see them on every brand of car.

    a car will inevitably sag with added weight on the rear, and reducing this sag helps with handling and axle loads.

    i think its also a problem that Australian caravan manufacturers seem to build very front heavy vans compared to their european counterparts.

    they also smooth the ride by stiffening up the joint where the hitch is, which normally needs to pivot, but can have benefit to resistance of such in the up and down direction compared with the side to side.

    smoothing out bounciness is a big safety plus

    sure they can be used in situations where something else should be changed, and they might be over represented in accidents, as these are people that might be near their limits, but there is a huge range of legal towball weight allowance for any car and van combo, this is just another way to let you adjust it, while having added benefits as mentioned

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Black Rock
    Posts
    1,228
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by haydent View Post
    I dont think it is mentioned anywhere, and its just a old wives tale that you cant use them. There is nothing special about them that the suspension would even experience or have to interact with, all it does is change the load experienced by the axles by making a stiffer joint at the hitch.

    no different to just having a heavier or lighter tow ball weight through normal means
    Nup. Right there in the handbook. Page 190: An equalising or other form of weight distributing hitch should not be used with your vehicle.

    Towing WDH.JPG
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by p38arover; 27th July 2025 at 10:04 AM.
    2013 D4 expedition equipped
    1966 Army workshop trailer
    (previously SII 2.25 swb, SIII 2.25 swb & lwb, P38 Vogue, 1993 LSE 3.9V8 then HS2.8)

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mid North Coast, NSW
    Posts
    1,093
    Total Downloaded
    51.4 KB
    ah thanks for that, i stand corrected, i was searching for different words than what they used. pity there's not more detail there as to why, if they think its just not necessary or something else

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Black Rock
    Posts
    1,228
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by haydent View Post
    ah thanks for that, i stand corrected, i was searching for different words than what they used. pity there's not more detail there as to why, if they think its just not necessary or something else
    No probs. I've been rummaging through the workshop manual, but it doesn't rate a mention.
    2013 D4 expedition equipped
    1966 Army workshop trailer
    (previously SII 2.25 swb, SIII 2.25 swb & lwb, P38 Vogue, 1993 LSE 3.9V8 then HS2.8)

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by haydent View Post
    ah thanks for that, i stand corrected, i was searching for different words than what they used. pity there's not more detail there as to why, if they think its just not necessary or something else
    The Why is that the suspension will continuously fight the WDH causing issues rather than solving them.

    The vehicle measures load, think inline with how it knows it's grounded offroad and goes to super extended - it's the load measured inside the bag (pressure) and keeps trying to return to spec.

    WDH are a band-aid. The added stresses on the frame and hitch point are quite crazy.

    As another mentioned - a well set up combination won't need them. Our 24? van certainly doesn't.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I certainly don't need a weight distribution hitch but what do need is a GVM upgrade because the car handles exceptionally well, tows fantastically and feels safe and stable along with good servicing and maintenance there are no issues other than the legality of numbers?
    Discovery 1 4.6, true trac front and rear, superior engineering arms,old tourer now bush toy
    Discovery 4 3.0 HSE MY13 ECB Bull bar, winch, spot lights, aux fuel tank, Kaymar rear bar, duel wheel carriers, 18 tuff ant wheels 265/65/18 BFG KO2's for play

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mid North Coast, NSW
    Posts
    1,093
    Total Downloaded
    51.4 KB
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    The Why is that the suspension will continuously fight the WDH causing issues rather than solving them.

    The vehicle measures load, think inline with how it knows it's grounded offroad and goes to super extended - it's the load measured inside the bag (pressure) and keeps trying to return to spec.

    WDH are a band-aid. The added stresses on the frame and hitch point are quite crazy.

    As another mentioned - a well set up combination won't need them. Our 24? van certainly doesn't.
    the vehicle does not measure load at all, id thought it wouldnt be hard for it to be able too with a few more pressure sensors, it could give you axle load numbers by measuring the air bag pressures.

    (it only has one pressure sensor to measure the reservoir pressure)

    it works out the extended mode from the height sensors, and if it cant lower itself

    the WDH hitch itself balances out the force from the smaller upforce of the bars and the greater trailer downforce , the result of this is then experienced as less downforce on the receiver. the bars also put pressure on the a frame

    the only reason im using one is to move weight off the rear axle, you wouldnt think you needed one otherwise with self levelling suspension as it will hide the overloading of the rear end

    The Effect of 4 Corner Auto Leveling on a Weight Distribution System

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj2oqAiltsk

    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    I certainly don't need a weight distribution hitch but what do need is a GVM upgrade because the car handles exceptionally well, tows fantastically and feels safe and stable along with good servicing and maintenance there are no issues other than the legality of numbers?
    i think youll find you will go over your rear axle limit before the gvm one (the opposite problem of a 200 series lc)

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by haydent View Post
    I dont think it is mentioned anywhere,
    Its in my Hand book.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!