Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 72

Thread: New model Ford Ranger has 3litre V6

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    It's likely the same engine although hard to find any definitive details.
    I did find some data on the crank used in the Powerstroke and the journals are a couple of mm thicker than the LR engine (approx 69mm vs 65mm) but I cannot find it at the moment. It also inferred that because of this the block is slightly different as well, but I suspect all internal stuff.

    Assuming that all the sensors etc and basically the same and can be swapped around then maybe there is no issue in swapping a complete long engine across - after all someone has replaced a 3.0 with a 2.7 and did not have major issues.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,130
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post
    The new VW anorak will have the same engine ( and a lot else ) as the Ranger.
    Will open up options for all the blown D4's only if all the hardware, castings etc are the same.
    as mentioned, shouldn't be too long to wait after they're released before the CUB's start pranging them
    I cant see any logical reason why VW would use the Ford TDV6. I doubt there is a single thing that is better about the Ford motor when compared to VW's own.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #13
    BradC is offline Super Moderator
    No one of consequence
    Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Perth (near Malaga)
    Posts
    3,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I cant see any logical reason why VW would use the Ford TDV6. I doubt there is a single thing that is better about the Ford motor when compared to VW's own.
    Emissions?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by BradC View Post
    Emissions?
    And pricing, VW charge drug dealer prices for their parts.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,130
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by BradC View Post
    Emissions?
    I doubt very much

    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    And pricing, VW charge drug dealer prices for their parts.
    Thats the difference between the Ford and VW motors. The Ford one requires parts.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #16
    BradC is offline Super Moderator
    No one of consequence
    Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Perth (near Malaga)
    Posts
    3,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Thats the difference between the Ford and VW motors. The Ford one requires parts.
    Having had 3 golfs and 2 toerags in the family we’re pretty familiar with the inside of VW engine compartments. Can’t comment on Fords though but most parts that have broken on the D3 have FoMoCo stamped on them.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,480
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I cant see any logical reason why VW would use the Ford TDV6. I doubt there is a single thing that is better about the Ford motor when compared to VW's own.
    Agree, I think it's more to do with VW no longer making the Amorok (they've repurposed the factory to make an electric van) The merger is so they can share driver assist technologies, so they say.
    I have found the handful of passats and golfs I maintain to have no shortage of problems but all of them good to drive

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Godwin Beach 4511
    Posts
    20,688
    Total Downloaded
    32.38 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I doubt very much


    Thats the difference between the Ford and VW motors. The Ford one requires parts.
    And Ford bits are mostly much dearer than LR bits...
    2007 Discovery 3 SE7 TDV6 2.7
    2012 SZ Territory TX 2.7 TDCi

    "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- a warning from Adolf Hitler
    "If you don't have a sense of humour, you probably don't have any sense at all!" -- a wise observation by someone else
    'If everyone colludes in believing that war is the norm, nobody will recognize the imperative of peace." -- Anne Deveson
    “What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others.” - Pericles
    "We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” – Ayn Rand
    "The happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts." Marcus Aurelius

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I cant see any logical reason why VW would use the Ford TDV6. I doubt there is a single thing that is better about the Ford motor when compared to VW's own.
    Mazda went away from using the rebadged Ranger due to the number of warranty repairs they were doing on them.

    Hopefully VW dont have the same issues.

    And no i didnt see that on FB,it was out of the mouth of a guy who is a part owner of one of the Mazda dealerships on the Gold Coast,and has been for over 30 years.

    The rebadged Isuzu they now have has so far been a lot better,with virtually no warranty issues so far,and the comment was much better fit,finish,reliability and general quality control.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post
    Agree, I think it's more to do with VW no longer making the Amorok (they've repurposed the factory to make an electric van) The merger is so they can share driver assist technologies, so they say.
    I have found the handful of passats and golfs I maintain to have no shortage of problems but all of them good to drive
    I agree - why would you re-engineer the Ranger also to be the Amarok to take the VW TDi V6 when it is already engineered for the Powerstroke engine. Easier and cheaper to just go with what it was originally designed for.

    Now while fitting of the Powerstroke is still speculation, the fitting of the Ranger 2.0 Turbo Diesel to the new Ranger based Amarok is confirmed so logically the same will happen with the Powerstroke.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!