
Originally Posted by
DiscoDB
Nice one Shane. Great to bring some data to the dumbass debate…..heh heh.
Edit: you also have one outlier result (the first data point) which is also skewing the averages. Take that one out and you would be hard pressed to pick any statistically valid difference.
Yes, the first reading for the 5W30 is a bit of an outlier and does skew the average for the 5W30 compared to the 5W40,
BUT,
it is possible that the 5W30 might break down with increased distance travelled? That first reading was for a distance travelled of about 15,500km, which is the greatest distance for any of the 5W30 results. By comparison, there are 2 x 5W40 readings (that for the copper indicating bearings???), that are over 20,000km and have lower Cu readings similar to most other low mileage 5W30 and 5W40 readings.
You can only say that that first reading is an "Outlier", if you have other distances travelled that are greater than 15,500km that are low Cu readings for the 5W30. Yes there could be other factors at play to get that reading, but the fact that the longest mileage (kilometerage does doesn't sound right), of the 5W30 has the worst Cu reading by far and much greater distance 5W40 Cu readings are lower might indicate that longer distances travelled between oil changes for 5W30 might be an issue?
2014 SDV6 SE, Fuji White, ARB bar, Fyrlyt 5000, Pioneer Platform, Traxide D4-5S, Maxxis 980 Bravo, GOE Compressor Plate, ICom-450 UHF, Red Arc Tow Pro.
Elite Murray 2 Caravan 24'4" Tare-2917kg, ATM-3500kg
Bookmarks