Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Upgrading from 08D3 to 2016 D4

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    McGowanastan
    Posts
    694
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Upgrading from 08D3 to 2016 D4

    Gday All,

    Looking at moving forward from the D3 which has served us well but the ongoing costs plus wanting to start travelling more my mindset is to upgrade now and it should serve us for the next phase. Im looking at a TDV6 but this is based purely on my right or wrong assumption that the TDV6 seems less prone to failure, but im sure this is a very debateable view to have.

    So my question is , I have an extensive list of spares for the D3 ranging from wheel speed sensers to starter motor, new dunlop compressor, brand new alternator , plus many other bits and bobs.. so is the later TDV6 in the 2016 model basically the same engine.. im pretty sue the D4 has a different more powerful alternator .. but are most of the other parts the same.?

    Thanks and cheers Bulletman

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Perth, AU
    Posts
    1,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulletman View Post
    Gday All,

    Looking at moving forward from the D3 which has served us well but the ongoing costs plus wanting to start travelling more my mindset is to upgrade now and it should serve us for the next phase. Im looking at a TDV6 but this is based purely on my right or wrong assumption that the TDV6 seems less prone to failure, but im sure this is a very debateable view to have.

    So my question is , I have an extensive list of spares for the D3 ranging from wheel speed sensers to starter motor, new dunlop compressor, brand new alternator , plus many other bits and bobs.. so is the later TDV6 in the 2016 model basically the same engine.. im pretty sue the D4 has a different more powerful alternator .. but are most of the other parts the same.?

    Thanks and cheers Bulletman
    Sorry mate - all the diesels in the D4s from about 2012 onward are the 3.0L. TDV6 is just the tune level now, and a 2016 TDV6 can be turned into an SDV6 using only a computer (no hardware change at all)
    2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 SE remapped to RRS output, Alaska White, GME XRS-330c, IIDTool BT, Dual Battery, Apple CarPlay, OEM Retrofitted: Cornering lights, Door card lights, Power + Heated Seats, Logic 7 audio

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    McGowanastan
    Posts
    694
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by veebs View Post
    Sorry mate - all the diesels in the D4s from about 2012 onward are the 3.0L. TDV6 is just the tune level now, and a 2016 TDV6 can be turned into an SDV6 using only a computer (no hardware change at all)
    So is that in reference to my assumption about the lower tune tdv6 being less prone to failure ? Or.. that nothing will fit the newer model..

    Cheers Bulletman

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulletman View Post
    So is that in reference to my assumption about the lower tune tdv6 being less prone to failure ? Or.. that nothing will fit the newer model..

    Cheers Bulletman
    The 2.7 is less prone to failure or failure to proceed than the 3.0L variants (mostly), none of your spares will fit a D4.
    The saving grace of the 2.7 is the plentiful supply of replacement motors if it ever goes sump up.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Perth, AU
    Posts
    1,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulletman View Post
    So is that in reference to my assumption about the lower tune tdv6 being less prone to failure ? Or.. that nothing will fit the newer model..

    Cheers Bulletman
    Yes, I was unclear - I meant the newer model was unlikely to take too many parts from the 2.7L. For example, the alternator is 'smart' in the 3.0 with a different sized drive belt. I can't really speak to the other parts you may have, though I dare say there will be no shortage of people willing to purchase from you?

    On the question of being prone to failures, there is another recent thread that degenerated into that very topic, with (in my opinion) the only conclusion being there is no conclusion...
    2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 SE remapped to RRS output, Alaska White, GME XRS-330c, IIDTool BT, Dual Battery, Apple CarPlay, OEM Retrofitted: Cornering lights, Door card lights, Power + Heated Seats, Logic 7 audio

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    The 2.7 is less prone to failure or failure to proceed than the 3.0L variants (mostly), none of your spares will fit a D4.
    The saving grace of the 2.7 is the plentiful supply of replacement motors if it ever goes sump up.
    The OP is talking 2016,so that would be the lower tune 3.0L

    I think the assumption is lower power,due to different tune,less stress therefore less chance of engine dramas?

    That is if they both run same crank,bearing setup,etc.

    Yes D4 2.7L appears to be the best of all of them,but MY12 was the end of the run,and there are not many around,getting pretty old as well.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    McGowanastan
    Posts
    694
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    The OP is talking 2016,so that would be the lower tune 3.0L

    I think the assumption is lower power,due to different tune,less stress therefore less chance of engine dramas?

    That is if they both run same crank,bearing setup,etc.

    Yes D4 2.7L appears to be the best of all of them,but MY12 was the end of the run,and there are not many around,getting pretty old as well.
    When you look at the advertisement you have 2 seperate discriptions .. 3.0 Tdv6 and 3.0 Sdv6 so i assumed that the tdv6 was the lower kw tune .

    Cheers Bulletman

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    The OP is talking 2016,so that would be the lower tune 3.0L

    I think the assumption is lower power,due to different tune,less stress therefore less chance of engine dramas?

    That is if they both run same crank,bearing setup,etc.

    Yes D4 2.7L appears to be the best of all of them,but MY12 was the end of the run,and there are not many around,getting pretty old as well.
    Not necessarily total failure but manifolds etc affects all 3.0L, also not talking about D4 2.7, just saying in general the 2.7 is a much cheaper repair.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulletman View Post
    When you look at the advertisement you have 2 seperate discriptions .. 3.0 Tdv6 and 3.0 Sdv6 so i assumed that the tdv6 was the lower kw tune .

    Cheers Bulletman
    Correct,and both 8 speed from MY13.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,700
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If it is a diesel and has a shift lever it’s a 6 speed and 2.7D is the general rule. Don’t think 3.0 ever was mated to ZF6?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!