Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Diesel Vs Petrol

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Upper Beaconsfield, Victoria
    Posts
    49
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Diesel Vs Petrol

    So as I look for a replacement for my 2007 TDV6 HSE I came accross this ad
    in carsales.com.au that basically disses the diesels.

    "For anyone who is worried about V8's V's Diesel, i have done in depth
    research on this and found the following. As a general rule diesels are only
    about 20% on average more efficient than Petrol's. The Diesel 3.0ltr Prado is
    only 12% (most inefficient), it is cheaper to run the 4.2ltr Land Cruiser in this
    case. Diesel fuel is currently 15% dearer than Petrol. Diesels are more
    expensive to service. (Check with the dealer), Dearer to Purchase. There
    isnt any real gain by having a Diesel, it is a knee jerk reaction to the cost of
    fuel today. There slow, do not tow well, particularly at any decent speed,
    there noisey and feel very agricultural."


    Now, my TDV6 towed a 2 tonne boat with ease up to 110Kmh, certainly
    seemed nimble around town, averaged 10l/100km (or 12l/100Km towing),
    and was ceratinly comfortable.

    Are the V8's really that much better, or is my suspicion of an overly
    desparate seller more likely to be correct?

    For those interested the add is at carsales.com.au

    Cheers,
    Scott

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    if you skew the facts enough hes correct.

    when im abusing and towing heavy with big red the fuel return is actually worse than a very well driven 3.9l v8 disco1

    some are more expensive to service and occasionally a service needs more expensive parts (injectors vs sparkplugs) but look at how long a set of injectors lasts vs a set a plugs.



    but my money is on someone whose bought a v8 something and has found out that he cant support its drinking habit with his driving style.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Replacement for a one year old car what sort of w.....*self edited*

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,509
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Fuel consumption with petrol engines varies much more than it does with diesels, for example between city and country driving, so any comparison can be slanted according to what you want to prove.

    But fuel cost is not the only consideration. Even 20% better economy translates straight into 20% longer range, which can either mean not carrying extra fuel or simply in town mean more choice where and when to buy it.

    And even if servicing is cheaper for a petrol engine (is it?), as a general rule, diesels are more durable.

    But - what is the biggest cost in running a vehicle? No, it is not fuel. It is depreciation, by a long way (usually at least twice the cost per kilometre that fuel is). Now as you may have noticed, "V8" is a dirty word when trying to sell a second hand car. Yep, right - depreciation can be expected to be a lot more on a V8 petrol. In general, this will swamp the relatively small difference in fuel costs. (and does this perhaps suggest why he is talking about it anyway?)

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    willvine Guest
    I do agree with the add to some point. As I am selling my V8 disco and this is the pitch I have used to sell mine also. I have just returned from a trip to cape york with the disco and am very happy with the fuel economy.

    Here are the stats.

    9650 kms

    1351.00 litres of fuel used

    $2528.00 cost of fuel

    =14 liters per 100.

    I had 3 people, full lenth roof cage fully loaded, tools,spares, (very heavy)

    We did the OTT, frenchmans, plus many other tracks and farting around but mainly highway driving at 100 kms I have big tyres and bullbar, winch, dual batt and lots of other stuff.

    Mine is a D2, So driven the right way a V8 can be cheaper to run than a diesel but this does depend on your driving style and what you are doing with it.

    A mate did the same trip last year with his TD5 and I think although he would have had better range the cost of diesel on his trip and mine petrol was only about $200.00 dollars in his favour, but I will check with him on this again. Plus a $900 dollar dealer service oposed to my $400 service before we left.


    Will

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I dont want to start a war but I cannot sit around and see a statement that diesels are generally more durable without adding what I reckon is relevant clarification - modern petrol motors are just as durable as modern diesels. Go back 15 years to either naturally aspirated Diesels or the first of the turbos in 4wd and yes they were in the main more durable than petrols - usually posting considerably more miles. Petrol motors these days are getting built to do more miles and the TDs are getting built to a weight and economy factor that reduces there miles. The modern ford transit TD in the deefer is built as a 250,000 mile engine. A disco V8 properly serviced with its chrome molly bores will do that.

    BTW when its time to re-co a modern diesel (which often means replace entirely) the costs are unbelievable - you could do the petrol 3 times over in many cases compared to recoing one diesel. The modern diesels are too light for the massive combustion pressures and run modern electronics that are very expensive - eg ceramic piezzo injectors (at $1500 + per injector). They are not high mileage engines compared to the old ones.

    I can see that some poor buggers will buy modern 4wds with TDs and the motor will blow (like is happening to many prados that are now 4-5 years old...) and the cost of the replacement motor will be so high that it exceeds the cost of buying a whole new vehicle with a good running engine in it of the same type. Can you imagine that feeling.

    Cheers

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I posted my figures on LPG V8 in another thread yesterday...LPG V8 is considerably cheaper even counting the LPG install costs (which still see the diesel purchase price higher than petrol with LPG) than diesel....and dont even go to the aural aspects.

    Cheers
    \
    PS. Can someone pls pass the popcorn

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Upper Beaconsfield, Victoria
    Posts
    49
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyDawg View Post
    Replacement for a one year old car what sort of w.....*self edited*
    My son put the Disco into a couple of trees, assorted shrubs and a couple of
    fence posts. Fell asleep at the wheel with crusie control set at 100kmh.

    Hence the need for a replacement. . .

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    4510 QLD
    Posts
    264
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why don't trucks, diesel electric trains, buses, big generators etc use petrol engines?

    Is it true the Renault, Peugeot and VW diesel cars have a comsumption of around 5L/100 km? Do the petrol models have similar mileage?

  10. #10
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,509
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    I dont want to start a war but I cannot sit around and see a statement that diesels are generally more durable without adding what I reckon is relevant clarification - modern petrol motors are just as durable as modern diesels. Go back 15 years to either naturally aspirated Diesels or the first of the turbos in 4wd and yes they were in the main more durable than petrols - usually posting considerably more miles. Petrol motors these days are getting built to do more miles and the TDs are getting built to a weight and economy factor that reduces there miles. The modern ford transit TD in the deefer is built as a 250,000 mile engine. A disco V8 properly serviced with its chrome molly bores will do that.

    BTW when its time to re-co a modern diesel (which often means replace entirely) the costs are unbelievable - you could do the petrol 3 times over in many cases compared to recoing one diesel. The modern diesels are too light for the massive combustion pressures and run modern electronics that are very expensive - eg ceramic piezzo injectors (at $1500 + per injector). They are not high mileage engines compared to the old ones.

    I can see that some poor buggers will buy modern 4wds with TDs and the motor will blow (like is happening to many prados that are now 4-5 years old...) and the cost of the replacement motor will be so high that it exceeds the cost of buying a whole new vehicle with a good running engine in it of the same type. Can you imagine that feeling.

    Cheers

    Actually there is a lot of truth in what you are saying, which is why I was a bit hesitant about putting that bit in. But there are two points I would make - firstly, modern diesels are not so much less durable than the older ones, as they are far less forgiving of even minor mistreatment than their predecessors - the examples you give of engines "blowing" are not lack of durability, but the fact that the engine (or injectors or....) can be destroyed by what would have been a minor incident (dirty or bad fuel, water in fuel, momentary overheating due to loss of coolant) with perhaps some loss of performance in their predecessors. And as you say, the repair costs are absolutely ridiculous.

    But modern petrol engines can be just as bad if not worse - for example the first Freelander engines, and I can think of a few others. If you are comparing the Rover V8 with the Transit engine, you are comparing a fifty year old petrol design with a new diesel design.

    However, as you correctly state, in the absence of catastrophic failure, and given reasonable maintenance, many modern petrol engines have far longer life expectancies than their predecessors - but parts for them are also ridiculously expensive. It is the older designs that tend to have reasonably priced parts.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!