Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Larger Tyre Issues

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Heathcote Junction
    Posts
    1,155
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Larger Tyre Issues

    Has anyone had any issues with fitting larger tyres to their D3 relating but not limited to the following;
    1. warranty
    2. traction control
    3. dynamic stability control
    4. fuel economy
    5. fit

    I am contemplating 265 x 70 x 17 - 31.6".

    Thanks

    Chuck

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    183
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by chuck View Post
    Has anyone had any issues with fitting larger tyres to their D3 relating but not limited to the following;
    1. warranty
    2. traction control
    3. dynamic stability control
    4. fuel economy
    5. fit

    I am contemplating 265 x 70 x 17 - 31.6".

    Thanks

    Chuck
    I fitted COOPER STT's to steel 17x8" rims. They are about 14mm bigger in diameter as they are 245/70 not 235/70 as are the standard tyres. They put the fuel consumption up by 1-1.5ltrs/100km, probably because of the lumpy tread. The speedo is almost spot on with these tyres as well. I had to cut the edge off my bullbar because the STT's would rub when hitting a bump and I couldn't go to access mode. No other probs with traction or stability control but they don't handle too well on the highway so I drive more slowly through corners.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Have fitted Mickey Thompson 265/70/17 ATZ 4 rib. Speedo is spot on with GPS but have knocked fuel consumption around horribly. The TDV6 uses heaps more to turn these tyres around. I'm just back from doing the Simpson and rubbing on the dips has ripped a few strips out of the inner guards. Otherwise no affect on road driveability.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    296
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My fuel consumption increased by more than 1L/100K when I put larger Coopers HT+ at 265/60/18 which increased tyre diameter by 9mm to 772mm.

    Have a read of the car bible web site, they have lots of info on tyres which I found interesting. Car Bibles : The Wheel and Tyre Bible Page 1 of 2

    Ryall

  5. #5
    Tassierob Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by lrdef110 View Post
    Have fitted Mickey Thompson 265/70/17 ATZ 4 rib. Speedo is spot on with GPS but have knocked fuel consumption around horribly. The TDV6 uses heaps more to turn these tyres around. I'm just back from doing the Simpson and rubbing on the dips has ripped a few strips out of the inner guards. Otherwise no affect on road driveability.
    I would agree totally about the fuel consumption, I think about 2lt per 100 difference at least. Interesting your findings on the speedo....mine is fine up to about 80kph (you don't notice the error anyway) and after that mine reads about 97kph when the GPS indicates 100. At 100kph on the speedo the GPS is reading 105 plus so I have to be very careful not to become a revenue raising film star

    My front tyres also rub on the chassis rails on full lock so they are nicely polished.
    Typical of an agressive tread you will also notice some more noise on the road though it is not excessive.Otherwise they are an excellent all round tyre doing well on wet tarmac, mud, rock and gravel and I would definitely put another set on.

  6. #6
    Munners17 Guest
    Hi guys, first post....

    I'm really suprised that such a small difference in size can have such a big impact on fuel consumption. Is it more to do with tread pattern?

    I might be mistaken but according to the LR Australia brichure you can get 255/60 R18 tyres as standard or 255/55 R19 as standard.

    Looking here Car Bibles : The Wheel and Tyre Bible Page 2 of 2 suggests that those two sizes have about a 30mm differnce in diameter and a 5% difference in circumfrence but are still fitted to the same car with presumambly the same gearbox & diff ratios?

    Seems odd to me??

    Munners17

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Yass NSW
    Posts
    5,599
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Re fuel consumption fitting the bullbar to my D3 made more difference to fuel economy that going to the 18"General Grabber tyres (same size as wranglers ) so I'm not convinced it's the tread pattern.

    Regards,
    Totes

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No Munners, the ATZ 4 rib is a pretty clean tread, certainly no worse than Grabber AT2's but the TDV6 certainly makes hard work of the greater diameter. In fact it often decides to hold 5th gear instead of uploading to 6th on the highway. Manual overide can help this but around town i'm up about 3 litres per 100km. Mine is chipped so there should be plenty of power to handle the extra tyre height, just likes a drink to do it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    296
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Munners,

    To check tyre sizes and diameters I use Tyre Size Calculator @ ExplorOz where you can compare different sizes easily.

    Re the 255/60 R18 and 255/55 R19 tyres, the 18's are 763.2mm and the 19's are 763.1mm in diameter which would be covered by normal variation in a set of tyres the same size.

    Ryall

  10. #10
    Warrigal57 Guest
    Chuck

    I have been running Cooper S/T 265/70 x 17 for off road trips on my D3 diesel; with another set of 255/60x18 for general use as the larger tyres are not legit in QLD (where allowable max increase on OEM is 15mm).

    Re your questions:
    1. warranty - my 2006 model is now out of warranty but no comment made by the Brisbane dealer at any time when I had them service the car with the larger tyres; even when there was some warranty work done on bushes wearing prematurely.
    2. traction control - seems fine, never noticed any issues.
    3. dynamic stability control - likewise, the car drives well and I don't notice any increased intervention by DSC.
    4. fuel economy - increased by about 1-1.5L/100km but the system would be under reading slightly due to the increased rolling circumfrance of the larger tyre; so not as large an increase as recorded.
    5. fit - no problems at the front with standard bumper and no rubbing on chassis as mentioned by others. Fitted a TJM steel bar and then had to cut the bar ends off to match the original as they intruded into the wheel well - no problems since, I don't think you'd have this problem with the ARB bars that I've seen.
    Some rubbing at the rear under full compression in the front of the rear wheel arch - very light and hasn't caused any tyre damage. There is a panel join under the arch liner which is the problem on my vehicle (an S model) - better if this was modified to avoid the contact.
    I've done a Simpson trip with a heavy load (5 people, roof rack etc) and there was very occasional rubbing but in other respects the car drove and rode very well. Completed another similar trip to the Strezlecki/Flinders ranges with less load (just my wife and I) and no rubbing at all despite many high speed miles.

    As mentioned above the sealed road handling won't be as good but the vehicle still drives and handles well. Don't notice any decrease in acceleration, braking seems slightly poorer but this is in part from the extra weight being carried on trips (still stops better than my old Prado) - just keep these factors in mind.
    If I was using this size all the time I would be opting for a less agressive tread in a LT for the better handling and safety on sealed roads.
    There are other threads on this subject in this forum with more info. Cheers.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!