Thanks Sniegy.
My Bad, Still illegal.

Still dragging their heals?
Thought it would be done and dusted by now.

Seem to follow European standards in everything else? Why not just ok the system where the restraints are fitted by the manufactuerer?
Really shouldn't under estimate the ability for bureaucrats to stuff around.
Important details for Australian ISOFIX child restraints from Britax – Babyology
http://www.standards.org.au/OurOrgan...lease%20MR.pdf
"The Australian system, whilst it was revolutionary when it was first introduced and was a big advancement in child seat safety, is no longer the most reliable system, and thats been highlighted by the fact that a lot of research has shown that in the order of two-thirds of child seats are incorrectly mounted.
Isofix child restraints to be legalised in 2013 | CarAdvice
The reality?
Essential Baby > ISOFIX Is coming
"Extended rear facing and ISOFIX are two totally separate issues.
We currently have provision in the Australian Standard (and have had for years) for a "Type D" restraint which is a rear facing restraint for children to 4yrs.
It is just that as yet manufacturers have seen no need (or market) to create a RF restraint to 4yrs.
ISOFIX on the other hand is for ALL types of restraints (ie. RF. ERF. FF and Boosters).
What has happened is at the moment the FIRST HURDLE to getting ISOFIX here has been jumped. The ADR (Aust Design Rule) for cars has been changed which means that from Nov this year all cars plated from them (ie. approval plated not registered plated) will be required to have ISOFIX points.
No research has clearly shown again and again that apart from being nearly idiot proof to install ISOFIX is also SAFER then our TT/Seatbelt in Side impact accidents. Even research done with a Holden Commodore (modified) with the same shell Aussie seat (with TT/Seatbelt and TT/Latch and TT/ISOFIX) also came to the conclusion (which also marries up with overseas research) that ISOFIX is superior in side impact accidents.
So yes now the ADR for child restraints has changed.
Now stage II has to happen - for the Australian Standard for Child Restraints to be changed to include ISOFIX fittings. As PP has pointed out there is some debate in the media as to whether it is a 2013 due date for the standard to be updated or 2013 due date for the START of discussions over a proposed new standard.
Either way once Stage II has been passed it is then onto the manufacturers for Stage III - actual research and design of an Aussie Standard ISOFIX seat as our Aust Std is not just about performance it is also about the actual DESIGN of the seat (which is why we have issues with foreign seats - they all have to be modified for our standards).
So then you pass Stage III - you have done your R&D.... now you have to pass Stage IV which is actually to get your new seat approved by Standards Australia. Even if you do get your seat approved first go, history shows a lag of at least 4-6m between 'approval' and a seat hitting the shelves in the stores.
So personally I would not be holding my breath for an Aussie standard approved ISOFIX seat before 2015."
If the new standard ends up different from the ISOFIX standard we may never get seats that fit the system as we are too small a market.

In my ignorance I thought they would see the bleeding obvios and approve them.
Bookmarks