I agree........
My D3 needs new rubber and I am wondering if I should just bite the bullet and change to 17" wheels at the same time rather than stick with my 18"s...
maybe a set of steel "dynamics".....I spend a lot of time in the Victorian high country area.....come on guys - I just need somebody to agree with me so I can justify the extra cost...
Thanks.
I agree........
17's are safer.....................how's that; justified?
 TopicToaster
					
					
						TopicToaster
					
					
                                        
					
					
						There are a lot more 18" tyres out there now so unless you're looking for something aggressive there's no need to change.
Pirelli scorpions, General grabbers, Continental crosscontact, Coopers and others. There's some threads in the D3 section on the choices.
I've very happy with my Scorpian ATR's.
Mmmmmm...decisions...decisions...
I have the Dynamic Steel rims with 17" M/T's. My reason for the change was where I drive and the much larger range of rubber available. North Western Australia, large loose rocks especially around Marble Bar / Nullagine and inland from there, and having tyres with good side grabbers and strength. My standard ally rims would of been a big mess by now and having that extra tyre height and steel for strength for impact when you hit that hole that was not seen and travelling at speed. Each individual has an opinion if it is worth the cost, but there is no doubt the rims are stronger and tyre selection available is better. A drawback is extra weight carried and when handling if you have a bung back like me. Only you will know if the change is worth it, as I drive about 40-50% offroad on rough rock/gravel/sand, if your in the rat race predominantly, steel may not be worth the cost. Each to his own, life's too short.
 Wizard
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SubscriberIt's an old magazine, but 4X4Australia December 2007 has a good article on tests with low profile tyres. It includes a D3 on 265/60x18's, and others on an assortment of low profile rubber. All Coopers in this case, but there are a lot of other brands available now than when this test was run.
Cut to the chase. 60 profile rubber was found to have no significant disadvantages compared to more conventional ( think higher profile ) rubber, other than the need for slightly lower pressures in soft sand. Tyres with a profile lower than 60, were found to be harsh on rough stuff, but unsurprisingly outperformed the higher profile rubber on smooth bitumen. Chase up a back copy. Worth a read.
I've posted elsewhere a pic of my grabber at2s showing the wear rates. They are getting close to needing replacement now and I've been happy enough with them, we've been to Fraser Island, done the Oodnadatta Track and up to Darwin as well as the Spanish Steps track at Newnes in them with no issues. I think that if I was doing lots of dirt work I'd probably think of 17" rims but for a vehicle that is a family tourer we have no complaints about the 18" rims. I've put 59000 Km on them now and they are still legal so they are wearing OK
Regards,
Tote
Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
Go 17"'s.
Just keep an eye on eBay. I picked up 4 LR 17" alloys for $600.
 Master
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Master
					
					
						SubscriberFleabay is the way to go if you have time. I watched and watched etc for 6 months, gave up on fleabay and ordered a set of 17" BB6 alloys, had them fitted for a week and my mate got a set of five D3 LR 17" rims and near new rubber for approx $1100 if my memory's good. My BB6's cost $2100 (6 rims) and tyres $1920, as against $1100, no contest.
Ryall
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks