Thread: Terrible low beam distance (Bi Xenon)

I agree the bi xenons seem overrated. My 2010 RRS TDV8 Lux is OK at night but low but I would like to improve them. I understand that they deteriorate over time but,
Has anyone changed the globes to something other than OEM? (Aftermarket manufacturers seem to have lots of variations at Repco etc)....If so what brand and is it a simple replacement or are other mods required?

My '07 has them too.
I've replaced them thinking it might improve things but not really. I drive a lot at night with the foggies on too, it helps light up the verges. No-one seems to complain.
I went on line and sourced some new globes from china, same phillips globe, same part numbers numbers etc, it was just a straight swap.
The originals were 5000K from memory and I went for a whiter 6000k spec but it's made little difference.
Mabe going up to 8000K might help but they'll be very blue.
FYI, I got a packet of 2 philips from ali express, delivered for $11-...
LR wanted $90 each fitted. It took me about 10 mins, taking my time.
Not sure about your later vehicles, but mine had a lever in the headlight to enable the bias to be swapped when crossing boarders and moving from left to right side of the road.
I also see the new Velar is quoting matrix LED so the bi xenon obviously wasn't a success.
regards,
Rob

My RRS originally had halogens and later I upgraded globes in the projectors (low beam) to 4300K HIDs. The lack of distance is exactly the same with both (though the light is more intense with the HIDs) - it is the design of the lights themselves - the cutoff is inbuilt into the projector and changing the type of globe makes no difference to the cutoff - hence range.

Now I actually think low beam is fine - for my halogen vehicle it is hi beam that is poor - at least with the BiXenons you have your HID hi beam as well as your Halogen fill in Hi beam.

garry

Whilst not the same headlight but my L322 is fitted with 50W globes whereas the D3/D4 has 35W globes so perhaps the L320 also has 35W. My L322's low beam illuminates to the cut-off quite well although the lights were originally aimed too low and did not illuminate the legally-required minimum distance. I've fitted 50W HID to the high beam fill-in lights for decent distance illumination.

Driving with fog lights on when no fog is illegal and the glare from most of them is annoying to me at least.

I'm very happy with my 06 l322 xenons. Not happy that they serm to have ruined a good headlamp in later models😞

Jc

I'm afraid I agree with Mr LR. At 110km/hour you're doing 30.5m/ second so a 60m throw is less than 2 seconds. Definitely asking for a roo strike or at least a headache over-concentrating on the way to Thredbo.
Sorry Graeme about the foggies, it's self preservation. They are only 27w cast out and down. I personally don't don't have an issue approaching them on other cars as they're not aimed at me or bright.
But that's interesting about the L322's, yes the RRS are also 35w as you can see in my pic. The headlight is the same so why not upgrade the globes to the 50w?
You might have solved our problem.
Cheers,
Rob

Originally Posted by garrycol

My RRS originally had halogens and later I upgraded globes in the projectors (low beam) to 4300K HIDs. The lack of distance is exactly the same with both (though the light is more intense with the HIDs) - it is the design of the lights themselves - the cutoff is inbuilt into the projector and changing the type of globe makes no difference to the cutoff - hence range.

Now I actually think low beam is fine - for my halogen vehicle it is hi beam that is poor - at least with the BiXenons you have your HID hi beam as well as your Halogen fill in Hi beam.

garry

Garry,
I've looked into these HID's and read a few reviews.There are two wattages offered; 35 + 55w
I wonder when you converted from hallogen to HID, did you install 55w globes? Graeme seems happy with his L322 low beam as well and he's on the higher wattage, so perhaps that's the issue.
Mine are definately only 35w / 6000K so I looked some up on line today and ordered a pair of 55w bi xenon 6000K.
I'll do some before and after pics once they arrive and post the findings.
At $20.70 delivered, it's worth the exercise.
cheers,
Rob.

I but in 55w HIDs in my to replace the 55w Halogens. I could be wrong, but with HIDs, within and particular heat range, I understand the globes are the same - it is the ballasts that provide the wattage ratiing - so "55w" HID globes matched to a 30w ballast means you still only have a 30w system.

Also in my view 6000k are too white - everything looks washed out with the eye observing little in the way of contrast as things (like roos) are missed. Really 5000k is the whitest you should go in headlights - 6000k might be whiter but not better.

As I said above, in my view changing to bigger and better globes in the low beam will not increase range - the cutoff is in the design of the projector not the bulb. Adjusting the the headlight assembly might help.

My 98 Freelander had manually adjustable headlights from the dashboard - 4 settings I think - I wonder why it was not carried over to other LR models as it worked well.

Garry