Thread: Range Rover Sport

Originally Posted by dobbo

So it's basically a D3/D4 with a body that looks like a modern version of a RRC and not a goldfish bowl designed by Ikea

Yes, that's right.

I see you're up for some sport with a Sport, giving the rich waters of General Chat a rest to restock and rebuild indignation ready for a pop.

Happy fishing.

Originally Posted by rmp

Yes, that's right.

I see you're up for some sport with a Sport, giving the rich waters of General Chat a rest to restock and rebuild indignation ready for a pop.

Happy fishing.

No, this is serious looking, weighing up costs, ready for my hard earned to change hands in a couple of months.

IMHO the D3 is an ugly car, a Puma is not my cup of tea due to the obvious. I have always thought the RRS is a very sexy looking car the sort my wife deserves.

Originally Posted by dobbo

No, this is serious looking, weighing up costs, ready for my hard earned to change hands in a couple of months.

IMHO the D3 is an ugly car, a Puma is not my cup of tea due to the obvious. I have always thought the RRS is a very sexy looking car the sort my wife deserves.

Seriously, serious posts? You're going to resist the temptation for even the tiniest of digs here and there? I am disappointed and frankly sceptical ;-)

What's the obvious about the Puma?

I don't mind the D3 myself but prefer the looks of the RRS, esp the MY2010 version.

I like the logic too -- you want a RRS so you justify it as something for the wife. Not that I've ever done that of course.

Originally Posted by rmp

Seriously, serious posts? You're going to resist the temptation for even the tiniest of digs here and there? I am disappointed and frankly sceptical ;-)

I'm glad your sceptical, it means your brain is in gear and I may have a few questions.

Originally Posted by rmp

What's the obvious about the Puma?

The build quality, engine probs etc..... IMHO my 25yr old County (which I am keeping) is a lot better vehicle therefore I cannot justify the cost of a new one.

Originally Posted by rmp

I don't mind the D3 myself but prefer the looks of the RRS, esp the MY2010 version.

I like the logic too -- you want a RRS so you justify it as something for the wife. Not that I've ever done that of course.

If the formulae works, why change it?

Now have I passed the test or are we going to crap on for a while?

No, not exactly like D3, RRS centre row fold forward against the rear of the front seats and the rest is flat behind that.

Originally Posted by dobbo

I have always thought the RRS is a very sexy looking car the sort my wife deserves.

So is that how you are going to sell it to your missus? Come on admit it - you want it for yourself - I would.

Garry

Originally Posted by garrycol

So is that how you are going to sell it to your missus? Come on admit it - you want it for yourself - I would.

Garry

I never disputed that known fact, but in reality I have my Turdis and am soon to be getting myself a little hairdresser style "penis extension". I cannot justify 4 cars so one must go. The wife clause is the logical answer.

Originally Posted by dobbo

and am soon to be getting myself a little hairdresser style "penis extension" .

TOO MUCH INFORMATION