Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Range Rover Evoque

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mount Martha
    Posts
    1,399
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Range Rover Evoque

    Just thought I would pass on my comments on the Range Rover Evoque.
    I have one in my possession at the moment whilst mine is being serviced, as we are looking at the possibility of buying one for the wife. It has the 140Kw turbo diesel.
    Drove it home last night (around an hours drive) and around for a bit once I arrived back home.
    Here are my comments: -
    • Seats - Awesome. Big improvement on the D4.
    • Power - Awesome. Lots of.
    • Ride - Not as smooth as the D4.
    • Vision - Quite restricted compared to the D4. My wife finds it hard to see over the large rear view mirror on the drivers side (she is 5ft nothing)
    • Interior layout - Quite good, although I found that the paddle shifts on the steering wheel get in the way.
    • Economy - Was showing mid to high 6's on a steady 105Kph.
    • Size - Similar to the wifes BMW 3 series.
    • Looks - I think it looks stylish and quite unique.
    Would I buy one for the wife..............absolutely. Just have to get her approval.

    Cheers, Craig

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    where every one holidays, sunny coast
    Posts
    1,712
    Total Downloaded
    0
    if you get a 2 door, the reverse camera is a must,,, rear veiw is just nill,

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    328
    Total Downloaded
    0
    To be honest, the styling doesn't quite do it for me - i think it is a bit "look at me" and insular, although this seems to be where cars are headed. I want a car with good visibility that doesn't shelter me from everything outside so i can have good situational awareness while driving.

    1.5c worth.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,224
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think they look terrific, however my wife didn't like the looks at all. To her it was not a proper Range Rover. We had a classic for years, also 2 x RRS. She thinks a RR should be square and easy to see out of and park.
    One way of looking at it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prospect SA
    Posts
    2,131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco4SE View Post
    Just thought I would pass on my comments on the Range Rover Evoque.
    I have one in my possession at the moment whilst mine is being serviced, as we are looking at the possibility of buying one for the wife. It has the 140Kw turbo diesel.
    Drove it home last night (around an hours drive) and around for a bit once I arrived back home.
    Here are my comments: -
    • Seats - Awesome. Big improvement on the D4.
    • Power - Awesome. Lots of.
    • Ride - Not as smooth as the D4.
    • Vision - Quite restricted compared to the D4. My wife finds it hard to see over the large rear view mirror on the drivers side (she is 5ft nothing)
    • Interior layout - Quite good, although I found that the paddle shifts on the steering wheel get in the way.
    • Economy - Was showing mid to high 6's on a steady 105Kph.
    • Size - Similar to the wifes BMW 3 series.
    • Looks - I think it looks stylish and quite unique.
    Would I buy one for the wife..............absolutely. Just have to get her approval.

    Cheers, Craig
    That pretty much sums up my experience also.

    In that spec its a $85k car though and for my money that is a bit too much which is the size of a Honda CRV which is almost half that money.

    I loved the one we had and so did the wife, auto rear door, lovely sunroof and the centre console is just wicked.

    Pity they want so much money for one.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta Canada
    Posts
    743
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Dealer cannot get enough of them here.

    My dealer here in Western Canada claims a line up to purchase Evoque's here and I think he is not exaggerating.

    I am of course surprised, but for me, well I think the LR4 is too fancy and should have more Defender in it; the market thinks otherwise so I guess it is good that I am not in product development.

    Actually I think the D4 with a utility interior, coil springs, and the old swing type rear door would make a good Defender replacement -well at least better than that recent "styling exercise" - and the design cost is already paid for.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wouldnt be hard to do mate - mount the electronics up high, give it a real handbrake (not the electronic handbreak); bit of change to the suspension geometry and upgrading of uni joints etc and a lift (all factory of course) with HD coil springs; hard rubber floor covering and mats to suit; single turbo 2.7 or single turbo 3.0 (?); sliders; HD underbody protection; manually adjustable seats; serviceable pan on the auto as standard; spare up from underneath to rear door as standard...dont call it Defender 2, 4 or anything else, just D4 Extreme OR D4 Expedition.

    Cheers

    PS. I would buy one.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bbyer View Post
    My dealer here in Western Canada claims a line up to purchase Evoque's here and I think he is not exaggerating.

    I am of course surprised, but for me, well I think the LR4 is too fancy and should have more Defender in it; the market thinks otherwise so I guess it is good that I am not in product development.

    Actually I think the D4 with a utility interior, coil springs, and the old swing type rear door would make a good Defender replacement -well at least better than that recent "styling exercise" - and the design cost is already paid for.

    It is all the hairdressers buying it.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Parkdale, Melbourne
    Posts
    616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    It is all the hairdressers buying it.
    Or as my dealer back in the UK called them, the 'tight white t-shirt brigade'

    Something like 50% of the Evoques they had orders for were from these chaps, urban cowboys....

    I actually liked the Evoques they had on display & all the ones I saw at Gaydon. The seats in the 3 door are stunning, it's just a shame you can't get in the back of the 3 door without dislocating your shoulders and breaking your back in half. Oh and the rear window is like looking out of a postbox, bloody hopeless.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta Canada
    Posts
    743
    Total Downloaded
    0

    I just realized that it is not a Land Rover!

    All is well and I feel better.

    I looked closer at one of those things today - yes, the dealer does have an Evoque on the lot with a sold sign on it, and in big letters on the leading edge of the bonnet are the letters RANGE ROVER and not Land Rover.

    That explains it all; I am certain that there will be pink ones coming as well. O well, if that is what it takes to generate development funds for a newer Defender, well there is a price for everything.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!