If we could solve the challenges around electrical energy storage and delivery, I have no doubt that four wheels driven by four independent electric motors would be the absolutely best thing for off-road use. But even though I'm a clean energy advocate and I'm convinced that global warming is a very frickin real and present danger, the criticisms in this thread so far are not at all wrong.
I reckon electric vehicles will become the standard in cities where trips are short and infrastructure is dense. The biggest reason isn't global warming, it's to do with clean air and the advantages of automation.
Until we get some kind of break-through electric storage tech, extra-urban transport is going to be largely powered by liquid fuels which we either burn the same way we do today or perhaps catalyse directly into electricity in a future fuel cell. These vehicles will continue to emit gases. 
Whether it's electric vehicles in cities or internal combustion engines in the bush, the real "green" issue is where the energy itself comes from. Fossil fuels are *the* problem, but wind and solar aren't even close to being *the* solution. I want to see modern (fuel efficient, clean, safe, reliable, low cost) nuclear replace the bulk of the world's energy supply, with wind/solar/hydro etc contributing in every place it makes sense for them to do so. Obviously nuclear heat can drive steam turbines to produce electricity. That heat also can be used to synthesise liquid fuels from renewable feedstock including from CO2 captured directly from the atmosphere.
I already own a baby Land Rover and I'm hoping to upgrade to a big one later on for touring our amazing country. My city car is currently a diesel Golf... but I have my eye on a Tesla 3.
Homestar... I LOL'd to see your comment about the ugliness of the electric truck coming from somebody with a pic of an FC in their sig. I'm presuming a dry sense of irony on display 

Bookmarks