Page 338 of 451 FirstFirst ... 238288328336337338339340348388438 ... LastLast
Results 3,371 to 3,380 of 4508

Thread: Won’t be retro...

  1. #3371
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SBD4 View Post
    Yep, No doubt E-diffs are more effective than purely braking of spinning wheels alone. I find a non ediff vehicle tends to "fight" against itself when traction control is trying to identify when and which wheel to brake to force torque to another wheel. When ediff is engaged, braking barely comes into it.
    yes,just imagine how capable it would be in 'Rock crawl".

  2. #3372
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    392
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SBD4 View Post
    My understanding is that they are two completely different systems with "Active Driveline" being used on the smaller models (Evoque and Disco Sport) and "Active Rear Locking Differential" (ARLD) being used on the larger models (L494/L405/L465).

    The Active Driveline allows the AWD system to seamlessly move between 2WD (for efficiency), AWD and fully locked rear Diff. For the D5 you can get the ARLD by ordering the "Capability Pack", on the RSS and FRRR you get the ARLD when you order the a "On/Off Road pack" and is standard in the Dynamic models. The L465/L494/L405 are constant 4WD systems, never 2WD so, the while “Electronic Active Differential with Torque Vectoring by Braking” and "Active Driveline" do similar things they are in fact different in they way they go about it.
    You should double-check the brand new RRS spec sheet. It no longer has “Active Rear Locking Differential”. That’s what made me go digging.

    I agree with you that what the RRS now has is not exactly what the Evoque has, because of course the RRS gets a centre diff and full-time 4WD. But the rear diff is the thing I’m focusing on.

    See in the big picture you posted how the Evoque rear diff has two clutch packs? That’s pretty much the definition of “Electronic Active Differential” if you go do some web searches on the topic. It allows one wheel to be locked in sync with the ring gear while the other can still move independently – they use this lop-sided approach to help with accelerating out of corners, with 100% of torque on the outside wheel and potentially some brakes on the inside wheel to act as a bit of a pivot.

    I’m pretty sure that the latest RRS has one of those as a rear diff option. You can of course engage both clutch packs at the same time to get the equivalent of a locked rear for low speed traction situations.

    So I’m curious whether the Defender gets this treatment or sticks with a traditional locking diff.

  3. #3373
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TB View Post
    You should double-check the brand new RRS spec sheet. It no longer has “Active Rear Locking Differential”. That’s what made me go digging.

    I agree with you that what the RRS now has is not exactly what the Evoque has, because of course the RRS gets a centre diff and full-time 4WD. But the rear diff is the thing I’m focusing on.

    See in the big picture you posted how the Evoque rear diff has two clutch packs? That’s pretty much the definition of “Electronic Active Differential” if you go do some web searches on the topic. It allows one wheel to be locked in sync with the ring gear while the other can still move independently – they use this lop-sided approach to help with accelerating out of corners, with 100% of torque on the outside wheel and potentially some brakes on the inside wheel to act as a bit of a pivot.

    I’m pretty sure that the latest RRS has one of those as a rear diff option. You can of course engage both clutch packs at the same time to get the equivalent of a locked rear for low speed traction situations.

    So I’m curious whether the Defender gets this treatment or sticks with a traditional locking diff.
    I would say it will have whatever is better for all scenerios

  4. #3374
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    I would say it will have whatever is better for all scenerios
    in other words good on road and a compromise for off road !

  5. #3375
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    in other words good on road and a compromise for off road !
    No, good in both Won’t be retro...

  6. #3376
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    No, good in both Won’t be retro...
    so 'No good' in both, just what I was thinking

  7. #3377
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    No, good in both Won’t be retro...
    E diff isn't much of an off road compromise.

  8. #3378
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    so 'No good' in both, just what I was thinking
    Won’t be retro...Won’t be retro...

  9. #3379
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0

  10. #3380
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some new Artists illustrations, few things are off, few things look right..not a bad effort, surprised its taken this long for drawings to come out based on invictus/tusk.

Page 338 of 451 FirstFirst ... 238288328336337338339340348388438 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!