Page 71 of 121 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 710 of 1207

Thread: The New Defender

  1. #701
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jon3950 View Post
    I consider 10% to be significant and its probably more like 20% on the old 110. Also, its not just volume but useable dimensions. Although the back of a Defender is a funny shape I find it easier to pack than a D4 due to its length. The length in the back of the new 110 is much less than a D4 (can’t remember the numbers) and to me that is a significant compromise. It’s easy to say carry less, or put more stuff on the roof, but for me that is a compromise that I don’t want.

    It can’t be all things to all people and no vehicle is perfect. For me though that reduction of space in the back is a big negative.
    Its around 200mm less than D4,which is a huge amount of room.
    Using a RTT,not much more will fit on the roof,but it does leave a bit more room inside the vehicle.

    D1 rear to D2 was 150mm,and the general comment was that was a huge amount of room.

    I do think LR deliberately left it short in the rear,to accomodate the 130.Whether that was a good idea,or not,we will have to wait and see.

    Many do like the D4,LC,Patrol,old Defender,as a touring wagon, because the have a heap of loadspace room.
    I would think people that own them would much prefer the room than worry to much about departure angles.

    Removing the 2nd row of seats maybe OK for long trips,which i have done many times,but for shortish trips taking them in and out is a PITA.

  2. #702
    DiscoMick Guest
    One of the main reasons we traded our D1 for a 110 was the extra room in the rear. It's a major issue for expedition vehicles.

  3. #703
    SBD4's Avatar
    SBD4 is offline A Keeper of the TGO Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bundeena
    Posts
    2,809
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post
    Sean
    Although I can only take Mr Heslop on his word
    I’m sure he has been a little loose with the truth
    30% deeper than 900 makes what 1200mm deep water
    Even at max height that is well above bonnet / dash height
    Even if they had a completely sealed air intake
    After an hour water will find its way up the exhaust and into the engine IF it is not running
    As indicated in the deep pool story

    Now perhaps they sat in 1200 deep pool and kept it running and it didn’t die
    With only a true snorkel modification

    Or maybe they used a fully sealed extended exhaust stack before shutting down

    But as that story is written I’m calling complete marketing BS



    Having said all that maybe they have tested this jigger really really well and it will exceed even the toughest off-road challenges
    But colour me skeptical I’ll wait to see it in the flesh
    Before I start lauding the engineers !!!!

    S
    Nothing wrong with a good dose of skepticism Steve, it's a basic instinct that helps to keep us wary of hazards (taken to the cleaners)!

    Who knows what the true test parameters were? I can only assume that for the test to be somewhat meaningful the car had to be configured as it would be used by Average Joe. Maybe the success criteria was simply that the vehicle had to operate for 15 minutes after the 1 hour submersion after which point it was a write off.

    My take on it is, regardless of the actual depth and duration of the test, it's a pretty impressive feat for a modern vehicle to achieve given the prolific use of electronics.

    It would be great if LR released some test footage like they did with the D3 (maybe someone else did that). It'd go a long way to settling the doubts around the claims they are making and cementing some confidence in the legitimacy of the to its heritage.

    BTW I only bring this info up as I think it is interesting and gives some more points to discuss. With this stuff, I like to keep an open mind to both sides...it helps my education... God knows i need it!
    Cheers,

    Sean

    “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein

  4. #704
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agree it’s very interesting information
    Just that engines don’t run after they fill up with water
    1200mm will backfill at least one pot via an open exhaust valve
    If the engine is not running

    Agreed maybe the parameters were somewhat fluid

    Hey that old hilux on top gear spent a salty high tide running through it and ran again
    BUT they spent a little time making sure the pots were dry (ish) before jumping the starter

    Maybe they sat the Defisco in a big bath for an hour

    But before hitting the key or whatever jango starts this thing they would have to have emptied the pots of soggy stuff
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  5. #705
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Haha. Departure angle compromise is fixed by height adjustable air suspension! Give me extra storage volume anyday.

  6. #706
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    These angles are important to me and if a 110 new defender doesn't have enough space for 2 people overlanding imo you have too much stuff.

    Big Familys for sure would need to utilize the roof fack or a camper trailer.

    These angles are at high setting, increasing the length decreases departure or ramp which are both equally important.

    I find it funny that if it had a departure angle that was rubbish some would be saying why did they make it so long.

    A true 4x4 should have class leading offroad angles first and then get the most storage around that with a boxy shape, tick, tick, for both generations of defender.

    New one looks after family comfort and legroom more which was needed to actually sell it. The rear seats now look like a very nice place to be.

    For the 110 its got 34 cubic feet with 3rd row down, which is roughly the same as the D5 with its third row folded. Fold down the second row and the 110’s interior space grows to 78.8 cubic feet, that's a lot of packing space.

    Feet is a good measurement for interior car space as you can get a visual.

    For those that need more there is the 130(showing mid 2020 release), but no mater how the wheelbase ends up it will be a compromise off-road, however some as already mentioned don't mind as much as others.

    And for those that need less there is the 90 which is not far off either.

    Pretty much everyone's catered for imo.

  7. #707
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    These angles are important to me and if a 110 new defender doesn't have enough space for 2 people overlanding imo you have too much stuff.

    Big Familys for sure would need to utilize the roof fack or a camper trailer.

    These angles are at high setting, increasing the length decreases departure or ramp which are both equally important.

    I find it funny that if it had a departure angle that was rubbish some would be saying why did they make it so long.

    A true 4x4 should have class leading offroad angles first and then get the most storage around that with a boxy shape, tick, tick, for both generations of defender.

    New one looks after family comfort and legroom more which was needed to actually sell it. The rear seats now look like a very nice place to be.

    For the 110 its got 34 cubic feet with 3rd row down, which is roughly the same as the D5 with its third row folded. Fold down the second row and the 110’s interior space grows to 78.8 cubic feet, that's a lot of packing space.

    Feet is a good measurement for interior car space as you can get a visual.

    For those that need more there is the 130(showing mid 2020 release), but no mater how the wheelbase ends up it will be a compromise off-road, however some as already mentioned don't mind as much as others.

    And for those that need less there is the 90 which is not far off either.

    Pretty much everyone's catered for imo.
    Depends what you do with the vehicle. When I take the family.of.5 and the boat away on camping trips the new Triton with a much bigger load space and load rating than the 110 is not enough and I need the roof too. And it's not glamping. I can't put more stuff in the boat due to load limits there. I have camped rough plenty of times and this is comfortable but not excessive. Extra boat fuel tabks, boat spare wheels, solar, fishing gear etc etc before you get to camping gear. Now if you add in remoter camping taking in your own water and leaving with your rubbish, well you would need every bit of the d4 extra 200mm and then some. So no there are many people for whom the new 110 just wouldn't cut it.

    Cheers

  8. #708
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Depends what you do with the vehicle. When I take the family.of.5 and the boat away on camping trips the new Triton with a much bigger load space and load rating than the 110 is not enough and I need the roof too. And it's not glamping. I can't put more stuff in the boat due to load limits there. I have camped rough plenty of times and this is comfortable but not excessive. Extra boat fuel tabks, boat spare wheels, solar, fishing gear etc etc before you get to camping gear. Now if you add in remoter camping taking in your own water and leaving with your rubbish, well you would need every bit of the d4 extra 200mm and then some. So no there are many people for whom the new 110 just wouldn't cut it.

    Cheers
    Exactly.

    Now if it had a larger fuel tank,that would free up the space where a couple of jerries would go,but it hasn’t.Hopefully the after market guys will find space for one.

  9. #709
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Depends what you do with the vehicle. When I take the family.of.5 and the boat away on camping trips the new Triton with a much bigger load space and load rating than the 110 is not enough and I need the roof too. And it's not glamping. I can't put more stuff in the boat due to load limits there. I have camped rough plenty of times and this is comfortable but not excessive. Extra boat fuel tabks, boat spare wheels, solar, fishing gear etc etc before you get to camping gear. Now if you add in remoter camping taking in your own water and leaving with your rubbish, well you would need every bit of the d4 extra 200mm and then some. So no there are many people for whom the new 110 just wouldn't cut it.

    Cheers
    Agree, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, everyone is differenr camping/boating not vic high country/watagans or yalwal in NSW or cape york were angles are everything.

    For me, we go long distances, need good space, good angles, drive hard tracks, drive easy tracks.

    As mentioned by next year everyone seems to be catered for in the range. If you need big space, go 130. For most 110 will be fine.

    One big improvement i see is there is now lots more room for a fridge in the back were as due to the side boxes and smaller rear door in the previous gen defender it was difficult, most ended up with it coming out the side inplace of seats.

    Has anyone got the behind front seats literage from gen1,2 defender, i would imagine its similar.

  10. #710
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    Agree, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, everyone is differenr camping/boating not vic high country/watagans or yalwal in NSW or cape york were angles are everything.

    For me, we go long distances, need good space, good angles, drive hard tracks, drive easy tracks.

    As mentioned by next year everyone seems to be catered for in the range. If you need big space, go 130. For most 110 will be fine.

    One big improvement i see is there is now lots more room for a fridge in the back were as due to the side boxes and smaller rear door in the previous gen defender it was difficult, most ended up with it coming out the side inplace of seats.

    Has anyone got the behind front seats literage from gen1,2 defender, i would imagine its similar.
    "One big improvement i see is there is now lots more room for a fridge in the back were as due to the side boxes and smaller rear door in the previous gen defender it was difficult, most ended up with it coming out the side inplace of seats."

    What? I thought it was great. I built a draw system between both wheel arches creating a flat floor space above the arches and then installed a gull wing window on the passenger side and accessed my fridge easily. In fact I thought it was very practical apposed to a fridge slide that isn't space efficient or removing a seat which wasn't practical.



    Apologies for the screen shot, but I took it from my Google drive

Page 71 of 121 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!