Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Landcruiser warranty issues/ thoughts, views, etc.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    With Toyota the warranty is worth SFA even when you do have it. Pat

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    With Toyota the warranty is worth SFA even when you do have it. Pat

    Oh, that good ..... fortunately I'm not in the market for a Toyota then ;-)

    Cheers,

    Kev.

  3. #23
    jplambs Guest
    Thanks all for your comments, we ended up achieving a pretty good outcome, Toyota covered the cost of all repairs asides from the cost of the two failed bearings. (We can live with that). In a phone conversation with them regarding using secondhand parts Dad got them to admit negligence for having returned the vehicle to my brother in an unsafe condition despite the vehicle having been brought to them for that specific fault. It also turned out that they hadn't repacked the bearings despite it being noted in the book for them to do, out of schedule, at the last service. "We were running late and trying to get the vehicle ready for the 4 o'clock pick up so we missed it".. :-O

    They still maintain that the fault was caused by water in the grease which I'm now inclined to believe if they hadn't checked them for 40,000 Kms. The other thing we pointed out was the excessive surface rust on the swivel housing at full lock that had been there for a long time and when asked why they hadn't picked that up as possibly being a problem on a young vehicle they again acknowledged that they should have picked it up.

    Upside is the vehicle is now recorded in their system as being one that is used in "extreme" situations so will be given a much more thorough going over and the other interesting thing is that it was Toyota not the workshop that paid for the warranty claim. ;-/ go figure.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,907
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi JP and that’s a pretty good outcome.

    Shame Land Rover doesn’t look after it’s customers the same way.

    I buy new vehicles because I am not a mechanic and like the warranty to cover any work that may be needed, but I paid $170,000 for a brand new RR only to find out that it was the first new vehicle I had ever bought that did not come with a warranty.

    It supposed to have a 3 year warranty, but by it’s first service, just three months old and never even been off road, it was made very clear to me that the Land Rover warranty was not worth the paper it was printed on.

    And I’m not the only land Rover owner with this sort of problem.

    Land Rover also keeps a list of vehicles being used in “extreme” situations, but in Land Rover’s case, the list is used to knock back warranty claims.

    So again, good to see Toyota look after their customers when they do use the vehicle the way it is designed to be.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!