Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Bulls bars

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    41
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Bulls bars

    Hey guys

    Just wanting to find out from people who have fitted bull bars (plastic or steel) to the front of their beasts, what impact it had on their fuel consumption? I have put my name down at a british offroad at Nambour who are a landrover wrecking company for one of the genuine range rover plastic bars but I am now really interested in the steel bars that some of you have had fitted recently. Is there much of an impact to fuel economy once you add a bull bar? If I go for a steel bar I won't fit a winch straight away but will possibility once I sell my old hilux.

    Cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    112
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Initially no significant increase to fuel efficiency with an xrox bar. Although it is one of the lighter steel bars available.

    I wish I could say the same now as my fuel consumption has sky rocketed. Like 27 L/100km Not sure what has gone wrong still trouble shooting. I just gave the MAF a good spray with a MAF cleaner. Not sure where else to start

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Townsville, QLD
    Posts
    2,581
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I wouldn't expect it to be worse (if at all) as it sits in front of the car and at the same level as the bonnet at its highest point, slightly higher than the factory bumper at its lowest.

    Having an awning attached to the roof would be worse for drag.

    27L/100km is unreal! I wonder why that has happened Steve? Surely not related to the bullbar - that is a massive jump!

    Cheers
    Keithy

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    41
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wow! 27/100km that's horrible! My wife and I just went away for the weekend to 1770 with the ski on the roof and I returned between 14.5-14.7/100km which I thought was OK seeing it was really windy and sat on the speed limit 100/110km.

    I must admit though I am a little worried about adding gear if the fuel economy is going to blow out to figures like that!
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Gosford, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    2,556
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi

    During a discussion here recenctly is was agreed that wind resistance (eg a stacked up roof rack) has a much bigger effect than the weight being carried.

    So i would imagine the genuine bars would make little difference, and after market bars would, in theory, have a slightly higher Cd than the factory job.

    There is a little on modified front bumpers here [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_drag_coefficient"]Automobile drag coefficient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    Regards
    Steve

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Gosford, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    2,556
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by intheozone View Post
    I wish I could say the same now as my fuel consumption has sky rocketed. Like 27 L/100km Not sure what has gone wrong still trouble shooting. I just gave the MAF a good spray with a MAF cleaner. Not sure where else to start
    Hi mate

    Do you have access to any kind of diagnostics? Even a generic ELM OBD connector and free app will give you some data about your engine

    Steve

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Manly West, Brisbane
    Posts
    138
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I recently got a steel winch bar fitted in place of the original plastic, I'm not sure what the weight difference is but with a 12,000lb winch it could be about 50Kg more.

    Although heavier the new bar doesn't have the lower 'spoiler' section so I don't reaaly know whether wind resistance has increased or decreased but I haven't noticed any change in fuel consumption and I get around 17/100km around Brisbane, the only highway use is with a camper trailer and that also returns about 17/100km. Beach driving on Fraser (hard sand) was returning about 22/100km in high range and 34/100km in low range on softer sand.

    I was getting about 21/100km around town but a couple of tanks of premium fuel with extra injector cleaner added has brought it down to 17 which seems OK for a 2000 4.6 with 160,000km on the clock.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    112
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry to hijack the thread....

    Might have to run a course of tanks with some injector cleaner. Hope that helps a bit. Must say it is frustrating to be using so much fuel as it really takes the fun out of driving.

    I don't have any kind of fault mate so don't know what the engine is doing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    41
    Total Downloaded
    0
    RC42 you and I seem to be getting similar fuel consumption. At the moment around Brisbane mine is using about 20/21ltrs per 100km. I have just put one bottle of injector cleaner through it. Did you run a few tanks of 95 or 98 octane?

    Cheers

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Mindarie, Western Australia
    Posts
    1,141
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by intheozone View Post
    Sorry to hijack the thread....

    Might have to run a course of tanks with some injector cleaner. Hope that helps a bit. Must say it is frustrating to be using so much fuel as it really takes the fun out of driving.

    I don't have any kind of fault mate so don't know what the engine is doing.
    Are you basing your figures on the dash readout or GPS distance? Don't forget running with your bigger tyres means you are actually travelling further than what is indicated on the dashboard - maybe around 9% giving actual usage of around 19l/100k

    Gary

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!