Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 72

Thread: Cannondale MTB - What Model???

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Samford
    Posts
    704
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Maybe over ten years ago ??
    The CAAD 4 would've been out around 2000 and they seemed pretty reliable at the time, i think some earlier frames had some problems ?
    It's quite possible. I do drink a lot of homebrew, so........


    James.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Samford
    Posts
    704
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CJT View Post
    So I am now trying to decide on either the Cannondale Scalpel or a Santa Cruze Blur XC or TR carbon frame with either Sram XO or XX groupset front to rear including hydraulic discs.
    Well we all know what I would pick !

    What are the brakes?


    James.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Sunshine Coast, Gladstone, QLD
    Posts
    1,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rainman View Post
    Well we all know what I would pick !

    What are the brakes?


    James.
    Lol...yesterday I was set on the Scalpel (I found an awesome deal on this one SCALPEL TEAM) but today I am leaning more towards the Santa Cruz...

    Brakes would match the groupset, so either SRAM XX or XO depending on build level I decide on.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    From what i've read recently, current XTR brakes spank Avid/Sram, but being an inveterate weight weenie I'd go for Formula (says the man using original Hayes mag hydro's, that's how old my bike is )

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Sunshine Coast, Gladstone, QLD
    Posts
    1,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    From what i've read recently, current XTR brakes spank Avid/Sram, but being an inveterate weight weenie I'd go for Formula (says the man using original Hayes mag hydro's, that's how old my bike is )
    I have heard the same about the new XTR brakes but I would prefer to keep it all the same group.

    As far as weight goes, I specced up the bike at lunch time today with the bike shop with final weight coming in at approximately 9.2kg - 9.5kg.

    I would say that is not bad for a bike with 130mm travel front and rear...

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CJT View Post
    I have heard the same about the new XTR brakes but I would prefer to keep it all the same group.

    As far as weight goes, I specced up the bike at lunch time today with the bike shop with final weight coming in at approximately 9.2kg - 9.5kg.

    I would say that is not bad for a bike with 130mm travel front and rear...
    Sounds like the Blur got the nod as i do no think the Scalpel has 130 mm of travel.

    Great choice always loved Santa Cruz just never got around to buying one.

    George

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I lurv my 2011 Cross Country full XTR group - it is slick. Looking forward to pics, CJT!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,461
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well as you might have noticed I've been a bit quiet around here of late. I've been doing a bit of biking.

    All road so far but I was looking at a bit of a go into mountain biking. I've got a really good bike shop that is a giant dealer so I was going to get one of these puppies.

    As has been said so much of it is all just personal preference. I've had a good run with giant and the bike shop offers sensational backup.

    That particular bike seems to be getting pretty good reviews and is good value for money.
     2005 Defender 110 

  9. #59
    Rayngie Guest
    Captain,

    as a devotee of 29ers,() i have three of them! ), the Anthem 29er being one , i can say they are very good...can't beat them for value for money, i've had a blast on mine, very solid to ride, even for a clydesdale like me..

    you won't be disapointed with one

    Ray

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Samford
    Posts
    704
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Oh no. The 29er enters......

    29ers are momentum machines. Because of the larger rotating mass they are better for long distance/firetrail type rides. Also, the slightly higher centre of gravity and gyroscopic momentum means that they don't change direction as well so if you're planning of smashing single tracks a 26 inch would be better.

    Still, 29ers are all the rage at the moment. It's going to be interesting to see if the popularity remains, or if they overtake 26ers.


    James.

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!