Thread: Best Swivel Recovery Points?

The bolts dont look sufficiently large enough for me and i'd want a much larger plate on the back to spread the load - double the dims at least .

I have used those swivels extensively back in the UK. The rear plate is threaded and the bolts are high tensile, so there is nothing wrong with their strength and manufacture.

The main point is to mount them as close to the chassis mountings as possible. A 90 degree spreader plate with oversize holes in between the 2 blocks and fixed to the mountings of the bullbar will not go amiss either.

sorry, i don't like it.
i don't think the d shackle is large enough for a disco,
the eye bolt also looks to be too small for the job also.
and i don't understand why the threaded back plate is smaller than the front plate,
common sense would have the back plate larger than the front just to help spread the load,
i checked famous four's website, but no information is given as to the strength of these.
there are better items available in aus.
i wouldn't want anything less than 4.75 tonne
i should also say that the bar you fit any thing like this to should be strong enough also, 3mm steel in most bars will be too light.

loubrey has the right idea, tie the mounting of this sort of anchor point back to the chassis with a strong angle piece.

Originally Posted by harry

sorry, i don't like it.
i don't think the d shackle is large enough for a disco,
the eye bolt also looks to be too small for the job also.
and i don't understand why the threaded back plate is smaller than the front plate,
common sense would have the back plate larger than the front just to help spread the load,
i checked famous four's website, but no information is given as to the strength of these.
there are better items available in aus.
i wouldn't want anything less than 4.75 tonne
i should also say that the bar you fit any thing like this to should be strong enough also, 3mm steel in most bars will be too light.

loubrey has the right idea, tie the mounting of this sort of anchor point back to the chassis with a strong angle piece.

Although I didn't specify it in this thread, it was always my intention to use suitably sized 90 degree angle steel for fixing to the chassis - and ideally a spreader bar as well if it won't foul my hoped for winch. However, I concur the shackles and swivel holes both look too small to be 4.75t tonne rated, which is a pre-requisite for me. If anyone can point me in the right direction for a proper solution, ideally in OZ and at a reasonable price, I would be grateful. Cheers Gavin

gavin, try a pm to dranged,
he has some pretty smart jiggers on his rangy.

I wouldn't use anything that wasn't rated. Something pretty from a 4x4 shop could be dangerous when used in a tricky situation. Have a look around rigging suppliers and nut out what you need in terms of capacity then choose a product to suit.
an example here and others to fossick for ion this site;

RUD - Load Ring VLBG

Don

Originally Posted by harry

gavin, try a pm to dranged,
he has some pretty smart jiggers on his rangy.

PM SENT - THANKS

The "D" shackle pictured is not a rated shackle, rated (SWL/WLL) shackles always have a thicker diameter pin than the body of the shackle, this one does not. D shackles are ok for use with a hook or the eye of a wire sling (rope with eye each end), but not suitable for fibre straps, they are too wide for the shackle and can be damaged around the eye of the strap, also no good for multiple eyes, use a bow shackle (rated that is ).
A cheaper simpler setup is to buy a couple of rated (collared) eye bolts and bolt through bull bar into reinforced front plate on chassis rail end, get eye bolts with a long enough threaded section to do this, regards Frank.