Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Drive Shaft Alignment

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Drive Shaft Alignment

    A couple of of us have been working on a series 1 86 getting it ready for the Outback Heritage Drive in a two weeks time.

    The old fella (Drifter) has been rebuilding the UJs and driveshafts and he finally managed to get them ready for fitting late in afternoon.

    The problem is we are not sure how the alignment between the UJs/yokes at each end of the shaft should go and the handbook does not make it clear. The handbook does indicate there are alignment marks on both parts of the shaft but on the ones we have the marks are only on the short end.

    So on the shaft itself, should the yokes at either end align or be set up 90 degrees out of alignment.

    Thanks

    Garry
    and the ole fella.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    on all leafer rovers the yokes of both shafts are set up in alignment with each other.
    on coilers the front is one spline out of alignment and the rear is in alignment.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #3
    drifter Guest
    ol' fella, huh?

    Thanks for the response - interesting about the one spline setting - we inadvertently had that on one of the shafts... only at the rear, not the front.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    on all leafer rovers the yokes of both shafts are set up in alignment with each other.
    on coilers the front is one spline out of alignment and the rear is in alignment.
    Thanks for that - any idea why the front shaft is one spline out of alignment on coilers?

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yep, its to do with vibration induced by the angle of the front diff in relation to the Tcase ouput

    Why its not 45 degrees out of phase I dont know but I do know that solving the problem by re-angling the diff to suit is impractical.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    yep, its to do with vibration induced by the angle of the front diff in relation to the Tcase ouput

    Why its not 45 degrees out of phase I dont know but I do know that solving the problem by re-angling the diff to suit is impractical.
    Thanks - I wonder if it would help with the vibration in a 101 front shaft - it is notorious for the '101 rumble' on trailing throttle.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    give it a crack, its cheap and only takes about 20 minutes to change it each time.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  8. #8
    drifter Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    give it a crack, its cheap and only takes about 20 minutes to change it each time.
    20 minutes, huh?

    Garry - I think we need to talk...



  9. #9
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In coil sprung Landrovers the pinion and transfer cases are not parallel. This means that in theory there should be a CV joint at the transfer case end at least*. These are expensive, and it seems that Landrover found that for their utility models (90/110/Defender) the vibration can be reduced to an acceptable level by having a one spline change from yokes parallel. How this works is not clear to me, and I would welcome any explanation as to why it is effective!

    * Cross and bearing type universal joints are not constant velocity, but if a shaft has two joints with the yokes parallel and each joint deflected through the same angle, the differences in angular velocity cancel out. This "same angle" criterion is satisfied when the input and output shafts are parallel. This is met (at least approximately) in the leaf sprung Landrovers, but cannot be met in the coil spring Landrovers, as the front diff it tilted up to clear the track rod.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The change of angle by offsetting 1 spline approximately causes the sine waves that represents the relative velocity of the 2 cross pieces to either cancel out or match up exactly. Theres a book at altc to do with drivelines that outlines it all with pictures and overlaid graphs.

    What I cant remember or work out is which way the spline is ment to be offset or how to work that out....
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!