Cable driven wipers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies

I'm still trying to work out which side of the Universe is up!

And I need to know that before I can agree with you if God's country is higher or not.

---

It's gotta be higher,every time I drive to Sydney for the kids to see the grandparents, I always use more diesel coming back(uphill), and no I don't drive faster to get out of Sydney!:angel:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by COFFEY76

The ONLY reason i have to jump through hoops is because the engine has a greater Horse power rating than the original land rover 6 cylinder engine.

MY engine feels like it has NO torque!

---

That's weird. In NSW it's the capacity of the engine, irrespective of the fuel. So if the 1992 RRc had a 3.9 Rover V8 I can fit a 3.9 Isuzu 4BD1 without question, similarly because the Stage 1 had a 3.9 4BD1 I can fit any naturally aspirated V8 up to 4.4litres and still comply with the less than 15% increase in capacity.

Go figure?

Yeah the 202 is just over that 15% increase of power compared to the old engine.

I would rather have the original engine, but got all the goodies to fix the problems 202's have with fuel and oil supply on steep angles. 186 sump with centre bulge and tuned the carbie ready to hit the slopes!


Oh well no matter...
Pretty confident that the 6cylinder brakes will past the commercial vehicle brake test....