Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: NSW rego questions/standards for a 2a

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    409
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Landrover (2a) is not a motor car derivative. If you think it is, what car is it a derivative of?
    It is derivative of the first motor car ever built. It has 4 wheels and an engine, seats and a steering wheel. By your logic, if I made a car from parts of an aircraft, it would not be a motor car derivative it would be an aircraft derivative. I suspect that "derivative" in this context doesn't mean "uses parts from", it simply refers to the derivation of design. The Land Rover is most certainly derived from car design, as opposed to motorcycle or helicopter. The only possibility for suggesting it is not a car derivative is to state it is a tractor or truck derivative, which changes the game entirely and I suspect introduces far more problems! The reference in the regulation to "car derivative" is attempting to prevent people from claiming that their "special" isn't a car, and also maintain the distinction with motorcycle derived vehicles etc.


    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I think the example of seat belts is simply given as an example of retrospective legislation.
    Exactly. I was simply making the point that whilst the ADR's in force at the time of manufacture (or first rego) are normally those that apply to the vehicle, there are exceptions where laws have been changed.


    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies
    how is anyone at the RMS going to know if the SIIa Land Rover was manufactured in 1970, or January 1965 or even February 1962?
    I've not been through the process yet, but don't you have to state the first rego date or date of manufacture when you re-register it to avoid it being classed as "new" and having to comply to todays ADR's. In which case I suppose we all simply claim the vehicles were first registered before 1965 when we register them?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Warb View Post
    It is derivative of the first motor car ever built. It has 4 wheels and an engine, seats and a steering wheel. By your logic, if I made a car from parts of an aircraft, it would not be a motor car derivative it would be an aircraft derivative. I suspect that "derivative" in this context doesn't mean "uses parts from", it simply refers to the derivation of design. The Land Rover is most certainly derived from car design, as opposed to motorcycle or helicopter. The only possibility for suggesting it is not a car derivative is to state it is a tractor or truck derivative, which changes the game entirely and I suspect introduces far more problems! The reference in the regulation to "car derivative" is attempting to prevent people from claiming that their "special" isn't a car, and also maintain the distinction with motorcycle derived vehicles etc. <Not correct: Australian requlations, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s had a variety of classifications of light vehicles.
    Motor car, was a light motor vehicle primarily designed to carry passengers, its derivatives were light motor vehicles based on the same engineering platform, such as station wagons, panel vans and utilities which shared the same engine, transmission, suspension, braking systems and shared some or many of the same body panels. Under todays definitions motor cars were Passenger Vehicles Motor vehicles that are built to carry people. Includes sedans, station wagons, coupes, convertibles and people movers.

    Land Rovers were considered goods motor lorry, they were a commercial platform generally designed to carry goods, the station wagon version was derivative designed to carry passengers and equated to a light bus. Under today's defintions a Land Rover were classified as Light Trucks Motor vehicles constructed for load carrying (including panel vans and utilities) and weigh up to 4.5 tonnes GVM.

    >
    <snip>
    I've not been through the process yet, but don't you have to state the first rego date or date of manufacture when you re-register it to avoid it being classed as "new" and having to comply to todays ADR's. In which case I suppose we all simply claim the vehicles were first registered before 1965 when we register them?
    They ask you the model and where it was last registered to determine that it is not a recently imported vehicle. Even if it has never been registered in Australia before, if it was imported with the correct paperwork, then it has to comply with the ADR (or other legislation) current at the time the vehicle was manufactured.

    Where some people get tripped up is when they build a vehicle from parts, in which case it is classified as a new "individually constructed" vehicle, although there are moves to have that amended in respected of vehicles like vintage cars where the manufacturer only made the rolling chassis and other companies, like the "Holden's Motor Body Builders" would construct a body to go on the chassis.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    409
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Whilst I see what you are saying, I don't think I'd like to present it in a court of law!

    By todays standards a ute (or panelvan) is a car derivative, but the LR ute isn't because it doesn't share components forward of the windscreen with a "car", because the station wagon LR with which it shares components isn't a car it's a light bus, because the LR ute on which it's based isn't a car derivative it's a motor lorry, because......

    I think I'll just fit seatbelts!!

  4. #14
    Davehoos Guest
    I found this link and it was a good read.dated 1985.
    http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/roa...Analysis_4.pdf


    NSW retrofil law...
    From April 1973 belts have to he fitted in the front seats of cars and derivatives first reglstcrcd
    on or after I January 1965



    VIC retrofit..laws
    From July 1971 belts have to be fitted to the front seats of all cars (first registered on or after 1 January 1951), prior to thc issue of a roadworthmess certificate (which is required on change of ownership) From February 1974 belts have to be tilted in the front seats of all cars manufactured alier 1 October 1964

    this was updated in 1988 and i found this


    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/series-2-2...-old-cars.html


  5. #15
    Davehoos Guest
    landrover station wagon in NSW was an omnibus and required seat belts-but an omnibus...untill recently.

    my mum always has wagons-crown- falcon-holden-nissan/datsun and untill ULP they had been M/LORRY in nsw.after that they changed to P/CAR.as did most 4X4.

    I know of early holden owners that had to remove seat belts as they called them unsafe.

    LEGAL
    what ever you do if you use the car for buisness-a wedding get some real advise..workcover and other groups are much more rude and nasty that aleather capped- bike pant HP officer.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    wollongong
    Posts
    43
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Regarding seat belts, i rang the rta in nsw before i tried getting Warthog registered and asked if i had to have seat belts. RTA told me it didnt need seat belts if they werent fitted when the car was sold new as long as my land rover was standard. The guy that did my blue slip also rang the rta to confirm and he got the same reply.
    So warthog got registered without seatbelts or reverse lights as thats how they came out. Warthog is a 1965 2a.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!