Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Differences SWB vs LWB

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Near Geelong, Vic.
    Posts
    453
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Differences SWB vs LWB

    Apart from the obvious propshafts, brakes, exhaust etc are most of the mechanicals interchangeable?

    The engine is obviously the same but gear box & diff ratios??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,129
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by geodon View Post
    Apart from the obvious propshafts, brakes, exhaust etc are most of the mechanicals interchangeable?

    The engine is obviously the same but gear box & diff ratios??
    Are the brakes different between SWB and LWB? I thought they only changed for the 6cyl LWB by going wider in the drum and adding a booster.
    I'm sure the gearboxs and diffs are the same ratios between the SWB and LWB, but these changed with vintage (check for sII box and suffix).
    They are all 4.7 diffs.


    For comparing SWB 4cyl to LWB 4cyl, differences that I know of:
    Rear propshaft
    Exhaust
    Spring rates
    Rear spring location. Under the chassis for SWB, outboard for LWB - this affects the axle spring perch widths too, so the axles dont interchange without fabrication.
    Late LWB ran a Salisbury rear axle, others ran the Rover axle.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Godwin Beach 4511
    Posts
    20,688
    Total Downloaded
    32.38 MB
    brakes

    swb 3/4" master cyl
    lwb 1" master cyl

    swb front brakes have a 10" drum brake assembly 2.5" (?) shoe and drum width
    lwb have 11" drum brake assembly with a 3"(?) shoe and drum width on the 6cyl and 2.5"(?) on the 4 cyl
    2007 Discovery 3 SE7 TDV6 2.7
    2012 SZ Territory TX 2.7 TDCi

    "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- a warning from Adolf Hitler
    "If you don't have a sense of humour, you probably don't have any sense at all!" -- a wise observation by someone else
    'If everyone colludes in believing that war is the norm, nobody will recognize the imperative of peace." -- Anne Deveson
    “What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others.” - Pericles
    "We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” – Ayn Rand
    "The happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts." Marcus Aurelius

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As indicated above 10" to 11" brakes and 3/4" to 1" M/C, with wider front brakes on the 6cylinder. Also, swb has one leading/one trailing shoe front and rear, lwb has two leading shoe on the front.

    Gearbox and diff ratios are all the same, and the only difference in gearboxes is the bell housing is different on the six. Front axles are the same, as is all steering gear. Rear axles are different - the 88 has the springs under the chassis and the 109 has them outside the chassis, so the spring pads are different. (very late S2a had a salisbury rear axle which has too long a nose to fit on an 88, even with the spring mounts shifted) Springs and shock absorbers are different. The bulkhead behind the seats is further back on the 109, which makes for a number of other differences in body fittings.

    Then there are a number of bits that are standard on one wheelbase and optional on the other. For example, 5" wheels on the 88, 5.5" on the 109, deluxe bonnet on the 109, adjustable drivers seat standard on 109 part of the time, that sort of thing.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Near Geelong, Vic.
    Posts
    453
    Total Downloaded
    0
    THNX TO ALL!

    As my 186 Holden powered 2A tray rapidly nears completion, I'm contemplating purchasing a pretty much un-restorable/parts vehicle to source bits to LEISURELY revert it back to a 2.25. Obviously a LWB will be preferable.

    I'm in no rush. It may not happen. The Holden seeeeems to be working great ATM. It's the 1st time I've been up close & personal with one & whilst the engineering does not stir my soul, I've been impressed with the no nonsense, efficient mass production design of the bugger!

    Nothing exemplifies this more than each side of the adaptor.

    Holden engine attaches via 4 bolts.
    LR GB attaches via 12 bolts.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by geodon View Post
    THNX TO ALL!

    <snip>
    I'm in no rush. It may not happen. The Holden seeeeems to be working great ATM. It's the 1st time I've been up close & personal with one & whilst the engineering does not stir my soul, I've been impressed with the no nonsense, efficient mass production design of the bugger!

    Nothing exemplifies this more than each side of the adaptor.

    Holden engine attaches via 4 bolts.
    LR GB attaches via 12 bolts.
    The OEM Land Rover adapter flywheel housing only attaches with 6 bolts engine side.

    The LR bellhousing is a throw back to a pre-WWII Rover car design, with minor fiddling when the 2 1/4 litre engine was introduced.

    In case you are a little confused with some brake info above. All the rear shoes on 11" drums are 2 1/2" wide. Only the front drums and shoes increase to 3" on the 6 cyl models.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!