Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Unleaded Additives Series 2A 2.6 Litre

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0

    95 is the way to go !

    Hi guys,

    i feel that im quite well qualified to give some input on this discussion as my girlfriend and i are just finishing a lap of australia in a S2a with the 2.6 motor. We are now almost 40,00kms in !!!!!

    'Lap of Oz in a series 2a' is the thread.

    We had to replace valves once we had driven from Perth to Syd. but these were the originals. Once that was done we experimented with different additives and fuel types. By far the best is no additive but 95 fuel.

    Ext valve clearances are a bit wider than normal and really are not that hard to check so there is no excuse not to.

    I can recreate the difference as we have dual tanks. By switching between tanks 91 to 95 the difference is amazing. 98 doesn't seem to make much difference to 95, so we stuck with that.

    Yesterday we drove from Coral bay to Canarvon at 85kmh and did 19.3 mpg (14.6 L/100km)

    I think this is quite good for a archaic engine design and the aerodynamics of a brick.

    Having said that the Ign is converted to Lumenition and the carb is rebuilt with all parts made by SU. Not the rubbish we started with from Repco.

    I think this engine is pretty much perfect for the car. Bags of torque and a lovely exhaust note

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I read some years ago that you need to be careful switching between different types of lead replacement additive. Different substances are used in different brands and there is the possibility of corrosion within the engine because of the interaction between different formulations.
    Can't remember where I read it but it was a UK magazine that carried out some trials.

    Here is some 'fuel' info from the Federation of British Vehicle Clubs, obviously some of the additives listed may not be available here.

    Fuel Information


    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Westlake ,brisbane
    Posts
    3,922
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The main thing that causes the exhaust valves to burn out is when the small ports that come off the copper tube that runs from the front to the back of the motor & feeds water to cool the valve seats block up.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Where is this copper tube ? didn't see it when i had the head off

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gromit View Post
    I read some years ago that you need to be careful switching between different types of lead replacement additive. Different substances are used in different brands and there is the possibility of corrosion within the engine because of the interaction between different formulations.
    Can't remember where I read it but it was a UK magazine that carried out some trials.

    Here is some 'fuel' info from the Federation of British Vehicle Clubs, obviously some of the additives listed may not be available here.

    Fuel Information


    Colin
    Hi Colin,
    we have had plenty of time between additives as we have burnt nearly 5000L of fuel Having dual tanks makes it easy too. None of the additives really made much difference performance wise except the penrite one. Seemed a bit more lively and smoother at idle.

    Lots of people in UK now are running their older engines on this stuff now:
    Aspen Fuel :: Home

    The ethanol that is added to all UK petrol is causing havoc with vehicles that are left unused for a while. Rotting pipes, tanks, etc etc.

    My father (he's 80 years old) recently changed to it in his chainsaws as he couldn't start them. Problem solved. They now start first time, every time.

    When we are back in Perth soon i will do a "dry" compression test. I fully expect all cylinders to be even at 150psi as they were when we left Sydney.

    Will report back soon.

    Nobby

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobby07836 View Post
    Hi Colin,
    we have had plenty of time between additives as we have burnt nearly 5000L of fuel Having dual tanks makes it easy too. None of the additives really made much difference performance wise except the penrite one. Seemed a bit more lively and smoother at idle.

    Lots of people in UK now are running their older engines on this stuff now:
    Aspen Fuel :: Home

    The ethanol that is added to all UK petrol is causing havoc with vehicles that are left unused for a while. Rotting pipes, tanks, etc etc.

    My father (he's 80 years old) recently changed to it in his chainsaws as he couldn't start them. Problem solved. They now start first time, every time.

    When we are back in Perth soon i will do a "dry" compression test. I fully expect all cylinders to be even at 150psi as they were when we left Sydney.

    Will report back soon.

    Nobby
    Nobby,
    Most additives I've seen are meant to stop valve seat recession and not aimed at improving performance.

    Ethanol here also causes problems, I found something on a Goverment website a while ago that suggested you shouldn't use ethanol blends in small engines and fire fighting equipment. The ethanol absorbs water then separates out at the bottom of the tank (where the fuel pickup is).

    Problem is that some States have legislated that a set percentage of fuel sales must be ethanol. Biofuels legislation - NSW Resources and Energy

    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  7. #17
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobby07836 View Post
    Where is this copper tube ? didn't see it when i had the head off
    You won't - remember the exhaust valves are in the block. It runs the length of the block inside the water jacket, inserted from the front, and helps distribute the coolant in the block. I have an idea you need to have the water pump off to see the plate bolted to the front of the block that holds it.

    Few people seem to know it even exists or what it is for.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That explains it. As i pressed the 'post' button i thought i might have asked a stupid question
    I expect our cooling system is quite clean as the previous owner had almost certainly used WA water and very little coolant additive. We found the evidence when i replaced the valves a while ago. We had to get the small coolant holes in the head welded and re-drilled to stop them leaking by the edge of the head gasket. That kind of corrosion has probably kept the tubes free flowing

    I'm planning to strip the motor soon anyway so everything will be checked and new shells etc etc.

    The next part of our trip will be shipping the car to Singapore and overland back to UK so i dont want to be stuck in some remote place with a silly problem that could be easily sorted in decent workshop facilities beforehand.

    R

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Nashville, TN USA
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0

    No lead needed for AU Ex-Military SIII 2.6l 6-pot

    just so I don’t ruin my rebuilt 2.6l 6-pot by doing something stupid, is it correct that your understanding is that the 2.6l engines already had hardened values and therefore don’t need lead additives?

    more context in case it’s relevant: 1981 Series III 109 2.6l 6-cylinder ex-military.

    thank you very much!!!!



    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The 2.6 engine has hardened steel exhaust valve seats, and as such does not require lead in fuel to lubricate the valve seats.

    It is also low compression (7:1), and hence can run on any petrol sold today in Australia.

    So the answer is, no additives are required.

    For completeness, the four cylinder engine has the exhaust valves seated in the cast iron of the head. This means that the engine is possibly susceptible to valve seat recession without lead or a substitute in the fuel, although experience shows that this is not a problem unless the engine is used with sustained high speed and power operation. And even then, regular tappet checks will show if it is happening, and steel inserts can be added to the head when it is overhauled.

    The 7:1 four will be happy on any fuel sold here today, but the 8:1 may prefer 95, and if the compression has been raised above that expect to need 95 or higher.

    John

  10. #20
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As far as I know, all 2.6 Landrover engines have hardened valve seats as standard.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!