Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Rear chassis height

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Rear chassis height

    I have had the wheels on my restored 88” chassis for a while - and it just doesn’t look right. I’m not sure how much it will settle with a tub on - but currently the top of the rear cross member is 810mm. I completely stripped the springs and put them together again (same parts and same order).
    I wonder if someone who has a resto at a similar stage would mind measuring theirs.
    Thanks. IMG_5541.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    To compare apples with apples, what tyre size are you running?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good point
    I have new Dunlop SP Roadgrippers - 7.50 x 16”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    993
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have same tyres on my 2a shorty..........tub on and hardtop but it did seem high when I was rebuilding will measure tommorow for you with pick
    Dunlop SP road grippers have a high profile more than the Continentals on my Puma 90 and 130, l wondered if front tyres would foul on my 2a, they didn't and there is plenty of clearance Are you in Metung? I remember someone doing a 2a from there on this forum
    if it's you your welcome to pop over and have a look at mine sometime your not that far away
    Cheers Paul

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Paul
    The reason it looks odd is because the chassis is nowhere level and I can’t see with the engine in the front and the tub on the back it will make a difference.
    Thanks for the offer of a visit - I may well take you up.
    Richard

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    993
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Pm me and I'll endeavour to be home, I'm in the midst of two 2a resto's at the minute, thought the first would be the last, but the bug bites and they are so much fun to drive
    Cheers Paul

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ricrose View Post
    Thanks Paul
    The reason it looks odd is because the chassis is nowhere level and I can’t see with the engine in the front and the tub on the back it will make a difference.
    Thanks for the offer of a visit - I may well take you up.
    Richard
    The only thing that will change how it sits is the springs and the weight on the chassis.
    Have you overhauled/replaced the springs ? Once loaded up & bounced up & down a few time they might settle down.
    The rear spring shackles look almost vertical whereas normally they are angled back when the vehicle is complete (if the springs are past their prime they can angle back much further).

    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    993
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Richard here are some photos your post has got me thinking about my 109 springs

    IMG_4109.jpg rear of my 88 IMG_4113.jpg hanger

    IMG_4111.jpgrear of a 109 rolling chassis I have IMG_4114.jpg hanger

    IMG_4118.jpgrear of 109 military chassis IMG_4120.jpg hanger

    IMG_4127.jpg IMG_4138.jpgall the tech info I have on the subject

    I'm guessing 109's springs may need resetting I'm thinking split them into their individual components then induce some bend into them using my log splitter and some kind of jig


    Cheers Paul

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Colin and Paul
    It was the vertical nature of the shackles that made me wonder in the first place. I have not replaced anything- but have taken the leaves apart, cleaned them and rebuilt them.
    The two shackles are equal otherwise I would have thought I could have swapped them about.
    Once I know that the height should be I think I will have to reset the springs. What looks like rust in the photo is actually copper grease!
    I have also looked at the check strap and see it is now too short!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ricrose View Post
    The two shackles are equal otherwise I would have thought I could have swapped them about.
    Once I know that the height should be I think I will have to reset the springs.
    I'd wait until the vehicle is complete, you will probably find that there isn't a problem once the additional weight settles the springs.


    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!