Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Series 2a gearbox ID

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Point Cook Melbourne
    Posts
    142
    Total Downloaded
    0
    See link:
    http://www.lrfaq.org/Series/FAQ.S.Ch...uffix.IIA.html

    Apart from suffix B, it seems the suffix changed on the 2a box when other non-related mods occurred to vehicle during it's life....

    Is this correct?

    If so, then can I assume that the s2a box did change post Suffix B after remaining life?

    THanks

  2. #22
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Land-lord
    See link:
    http://www.lrfaq.org/Series/FAQ.S.Ch...uffix.IIA.html

    Apart from suffix B, it seems the suffix changed on the 2a box when other non-related mods occurred to vehicle during it's life....

    Is this correct?

    If so, then can I assume that the s2a box did change post Suffix B after remaining life?

    THanks
    Link is corrupted - I assume it is http://www.lrfaq.org/Series/FAQ.S.Ch...uffix.IIA.html - I looked at the site, I think I found what you are referring to.
    The suffix number on the box changed only when changes were made to the box, and not just because the chassis number changed - and there are significant differences between B & C suffix - for example, gear ratios changed.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    John is correct:

    Suffix A - small t-case intermediate shaft (everything basically same as SI and SII)
    Suffix B - larger intermediate shaft, but still 2.89:1 low range and tall main gearbox gears.
    Suffix C - 2.35:1 low range and lower gearbox gears (overall low range ratio stayed the same)
    Suffix D-E - not sure exactly, but somewhere along the way the layshaft was changed to an improved design with properly radiused section changes which made it much stronger, plus a few other minor updates.

    Incidentally, many people (myself included) have fitted suffix B low range and intermediate transfer gears to our t-cases. This drops 1st low from 40:1 to 49:1.

  4. #24
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover
    Incidentally, many people (myself included) have fitted suffix B low range and intermediate transfer gears to our t-cases. This drops 1st low from 40:1 to 49:1.
    I've thought about it, but not actually done it!

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW
    I've thought about it, but not actually done it!

    John
    Definitely worth the effort. Cost me about $300 for the two gears brand new.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Point Cook Melbourne
    Posts
    142
    Total Downloaded
    0
    "Incidentally, many people (myself included) have fitted suffix B low range and intermediate transfer gears to our t-cases. This drops 1st low from 40:1 to 49:1."

    Is this hard?

    I reckon that's a great idea! Best of both worlds then...

    Just out of curiosity - I understand that initial S3 boxes are weaker - but I thought as years go by, technology woudl improve and better components, material, etc.. Why did LR go backwards for a while there with these early S3boxes?

    THanks

  7. #27
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Land-lord
    "Incidentally, many people (myself included) have fitted suffix B low range and intermediate transfer gears to our t-cases. This drops 1st low from 40:1 to 49:1."

    *Is this hard?

    I reckon that's a great idea! Best of both worlds then...

    **Just out of curiosity - I understand that initial S3 boxes are weaker - but I thought as years go by, technology woudl improve and better components, material, etc.. Why did LR go backwards for a while there with these early S3boxes?

    THanks
    * Involves pretty much complete disassembly of the transfer case to replace two gears. Of course, while at it you would replace anything else that needed it and probably replace all seals, bearings, gaskets and O-rings as a matter of course. According to the manual this can be done without removing the transfer case. Not a very small job but not really very hard either.

    **The reason the S3 box was a new design, was to extend synchromesh to all forward gears. (The original Landrover gearbox I believe first appeared in 1932 in Rover cars, when synchromesh on ANY gears was considered an innovation.) To avoid making changes to the rest of the vehicle, and remembering that the all synchro box was phased in during the last of the 2a production, the dimensions had to be kept exactly the same, otherwise you would be looking at different prop shafts, gearbox mounts on the chassis and so on. This meant that more works had to be fitted in the same space (changing first to constant mesh and adding synchro clutches to it and second), and it is hardly surprising that the box was found to be a bit wanting. Also, remember that by then the 2a box had been modified with over twenty years of experience in Landrovers alone, fixing weaknesses as they showed up. The works of the S3 box were all new, so it is hardly surprising that weaknesses showed up.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Point Cook Melbourne
    Posts
    142
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Excellent point and explanation. thanks.

    I will have the transer case on a bench - so it may a good time to perform this mod -

    Do u think I can also perform the ratio converison as well as the 1st gear stuff at same time?

    Thanks

  9. #29
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Land-lord
    Excellent point and explanation. thanks.

    I will have the transer case on a bench - so it may a good time to perform this mod -

    Do u think I can also perform the ratio converison as well as the 1st gear stuff at same time?

    Thanks
    If I understand your question correctly, I don't think you can fit both the high ratio transfer gears and the suffix B low range to the same box - because both may involve a replacement intermediate gear, which is, I suspect, only available for the most common transfer box, suffix C. This intermediate gear actually has two gears on the one piece of metal, one used in both ranges, the other only in low range. It may be possible, but I don't have full details of the high range conversion. If the high range conversion includes a replacement of the intermediate gear, it can't be done.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW
    If I understand your question correctly, I don't think you can fit both the high ratio transfer gears and the suffix B low range to the same box - because both may involve a replacement intermediate gear, which is, I suspect, only available for the most common transfer box, suffix C. This intermediate gear actually has two gears on the one piece of metal, one used in both ranges, the other only in low range. It may be possible, but I don't have full details of the high range conversion. If the high range conversion includes a replacement of the intermediate gear, it can't be done.

    John
    The High Ratio T-case conversion is more than just changing gears. The way the Series t-case is constructed (3 gears in-line (output, intermediate, and High Range)), you can change to any possible combination of the size of those 3 gears, and you will still have the same high range ratio. The conversions get around that by modifying the case to move the intermediate shaft to a new location. The conversion replaces ALL GEARS - including intermediate and low AFAIK.

    Mal Story told me that when he designed his conversion - the most common one AFAIK - he made low range as low as he possibly could (without further case modifications). But this means about 39:1 with a standard box (slightly higher than stock).

    So you can't have both unfortunately.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!